Of course, the creators of the security modules could build tools to help them be used better. Maybe not on first release, but at least after other complain about the difficulty. AppArmor did attempt some tools, and is far better than SELinux. Still not great.
As a long time SysAdmin, but not your SysAdmin, I have used two of these. Both had terrible documentation for which many "must use" paid software vendors advise disabling the Security Module as a first step.
If random software vendors' lowest paid intern cannot figure out the settings for arbitrary Linux Security Modules, then the first line of the directions will always be to disable the security module. This leads to them not being used in many cases where the security module would be helpful.
(To explain, it is only the cheapest and most inexperienced person that is typically responsible for doing things as they are not in meetings all day.)
I had assumed the "Tragedy of the Commons" dated to medieval times, possibly as a school teacher had introduced the idea (and to a child teachers are older than dirt).
In 1833, the English economist William Forster Lloyd published "Two Lectures on the Checks to Population"
Garrett Hardin’s essay “The Tragedy of the Commons,” published in Science magazine in 1968.
Political scientist Elinor Ostrom, who was awarded 2009's Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for her work on the issue, and others revisited Hardin's work in 1999.
Net-Net it appears that the "Tragedy of the Commons" is yet another method to keep people from even trying to better their world.
Almost as if the widely accepted public views were both pushed by the monarchy. (Support "our" guy, there is freedom in servitude. Fight their guy, there is servitude in freedom.)
theres so many things to do with a pc that i dont know where to start
Pick the first project that you think of and chase it down. If it sucks, then reformat the drive and do something else. Video game systems and file servers are great. So is installing a different OS on each, just to experience the differences side by side.
Edit: I don't think I am wrong, but reading more this company has massive leadership issues. I get why they are not sharing the name.
Original:
Not to be a dick, and I clearly have not read the rest of the article's author's writing, but these two items go together.
Our brand-awareness shrunk into obscurity.
If you're curious, I'm sorry to disappoint. I haven't name-dropped, nor will I now or in the future.
A useful way to market is to have the engineers post shit online that is true. Is it a huge market driver? Beats me.
I know I like my software crafted with care and try to patronize the companies that do it.
Perhaps.
Of course, the creators of the security modules could build tools to help them be used better. Maybe not on first release, but at least after other complain about the difficulty. AppArmor did attempt some tools, and is far better than SELinux. Still not great.