Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
Posts
5
Comments
1364
Joined
12 mo. ago

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I'm just wondering wether I get to hug all the animals? 'Cause that's just a win/win in my book.

  • And it does not matter in the slightest.

  • Even with the lid down, there are thousands of spores down there. It doesn't need constant airflow to have spores, all air is filled with spores.

  • That water and whatever bacteria is in it can not hurt you in any way. Your immune system is much much better at protecting you than that.

  • However, unless your immune system is literally non-existent, the bacterial spread is absolutely harmless and will not hurt you in any way whatsoever. And if your immune system is non-existent, I think you've got bigger problems than wether or not a bit of poop bacteria gets on the shower curtain or door handle.

  • You don't really want stuff on a bingo board that's framed like "this doesn't happen", like "US will not pass a law for real AI safety". On this board you have 3 things that would only ever be marked off on the 1/1/27. That's not good design.

  • I'm not sure it would end it. The next person to take command would have everything to gain by winning what Putin couldn't. He'd also have everything to lose, but in Russia, you don't make smart choices, you make dumb choices and blame someone else when you fuck it up.

  • Why would they though? They already got plenty advertisement without paying for it.

  • Don't forget annexing the country and stealing their natural ressources. Presumably to leave the country in absolute ruins the second it's not longer profitable.

  • I'm expecting Greenland->Canada->Mexico->don't know.

    They will attack Greenland/Denmark first, as a way to figure out what actually happens within NATO. Annexing and holding Greenland won't be much of a problem. The population is mostly uneducated, non-military and very few.

    Once they've seen that fuckall will happen, Canada is next. At this point they will expect a bigger push-back from whatever remains of NATO, but ultimately NATO won't be able to do much, since Greenland will be a strong tactical defensive position in the area.

    Next up is a bit of a breather while trying to calm down the Canadian people. They'll do this by having military pressence in the biggest cities, shooting random people, withholding food, water, meds from the population. They'll pretty much use the Israeli approach here. It's been shown to be quite effective at deterring rebels, and the world has shown it doesn't give half a shit about it.

    Finally they're going for Mexico. Why not take them sooner? Because annexing a bunch of brown people, making them part of the USA isn't what the fascist base wants. They will however be needed as cheap slave labour once the world starts cutting off USA. The economy will be shit, living conditions will start to deteriorate, and slaves in the field will be needed.

    I'm hoping I'm wrong about this....

  • The Epstein files are the greatest distraction from Trump literally implementing a fascist regime and invading and annexing other countries.

    Motherfucker could personally execute every single member of congress, the supreme court and the house, and these idiots will still say "muh Epstein files!!!"

  • He said he's ready to put boots on the ground and that the country will be controlled by USA for now. So I'm going with complete annexation of Venezuela. Next stop: Greenland, then Canada.

  • Problem is, it wouldn't be the first thing that it totally and obviously illegal, that still gets done with 0 conequenses for the fascist.

  • I'm not some tankie or anything, but with Russia being allowed to take Crimea in 2014, and give it a few weeks, but I suspect the world will do fuck all about the US invading and annexing Venezuela. What is stopping China from taking Taiwan? The biggest players on the world stage has shown time and time again, that you can just take land because you want it, so why shouldn't China just take Taiwan? What would make an invasion of Taiwan worse than an invasion of Venezuela, Ukraine or Afghanistan?

    Just to make sure everyone understands, I don't think any of them should be allowed to take any other country's land, but the world has shown it's completely acceptable for any reason, including wanting more oil, wanting natural ressources and farmable land, or wanting to blow up brown people.

  • Jeg tænker EU retter komplet ind, ligesom de altid har gjort.

  • Boligejerne var måske også det forkerte ord, nærmere dem der tjener mere end gennemsnittet.

    Men når jeg nu har sagt boligejerne kommer den nye aftale til at hjælpe jeres samfundsgruppe væsentligt mere end de gør lejerne.

    Elafgiften rammer primært dem med store huse, som mest af alt er ejerboliger. Des flere kvadratmeter man har, des mere el bruger man typisk også. Derudover er det uhyre unormalt for lejligheder at have varmepumpe, den har i haft mulighed for at nyde godt af siden 2021. Der er også en større sandsynlighed for at boligejerne er dem der har haft råd til en elbil, tillykke, endnu en bonus at hente på elafgiften, selvfølgelig medmindre man har varmepumpe, det har jeg set flere græde over herinde efterhånden.

    Lempelserne i topskatten er også en stor gave til boligejerne, primært fordi dem der tjener topskat og samtidig bor til leje næppe er en særligt stor andel.

    Boligskattereformen fra 2024 bragte også en halvering af skattesatserne for ejendomsværdien og grundskylden.

    Så det er ikke sikkert at du har kunnet mærke det, eller kommer til at kunne mærke det, men det er fordi vores leveomkostninger sutter røv i øjeblikket, men så overvej hvordan det er for dem der ikke får den samme gave af regeringen.

  • Also, with modern glasfibre tech, I'm fairly sure those sails will be a hell of a lot more efficient than 200 years ago. Sure, probably won't ever be as efficient as dino juice, but we wouldn't necessarily return to a 2 month voyage from Europe to America.

  • Or, you know... Read the generated report at minimum...

  • I'm no art expert or anything but here's my view.

    1 and 2. Yes. You used tools to create the art, not all that different from using a pencil or paintbrush, or a tablet you didn't create yourself. It was however your imagination that created it. It wasn't generated from a couple of sentances, what was created was (depending on skill of couse) what you pictured it should be. You didn't just generate 1000 possibilities and picked the prettiest one and called it yours.

    1. It would still require human imagination to create the art, so I would still deem it art.