
Crazy how much that 1.5% could have changed
Crazy how much that 1.5% could have changed
Somehow it feels like this whole essay could be summarized in a single paragraph of, say, 3 proper sentences
Wasn’t STEAM supposed to be something specific, not a replacement of STEM? Idk, I just know the acronym because Angela Collier did a video.
Plenty of stuff that works much better for white guys that speak English and with the right accent, because that’s who they are mostly trained on (image/speech recognition, spell check and translation, lots of medical stuff but that’s not very tech). Not sure about straight.
Edit: oh the image said cis, not straight. That’s easier.
At least half of all US voters is okay with all this, no?
The only one that feels like a statement is leaving out one of L, G, B or T. But even then, honest mistakes aren’t a big deal.
The original had a sheep instead of Garfield
Death of the author
People here keep using the term as basically a synonym of “separating art from artist” but I always thought death of the author was a different thing. Analyzing the meaning of a book while ignoring what the author says they meant.
12 year old you (unknowingly) made the irreversible life change of going through the default puberty. Plenty of people regret making that choice.
Computer science: pi is O(1)
So much in this beautiful equation
!yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com tends to side with the pro-AI side, it’s not very neutral
Any maths joke of this type will have obvious holes in it, that’s just how maths works
In that case, there’s no need to specify anything about the angles. Or, the characterisation the meme is playing with: a shape with four straight sides of equal length and right angles. Adding parallel to the meme’s version doesn’t help.
I’m just tired of this thread. Not only do Lemmy users have this weird urge to show off their high school maths knowledge to dunk on a joke that obviously only works because OP played with the definition, but they’re not even correct. The /r/mathmemes thread was much better.
Canon differential geometer hair
No it doesn’t. Right angles + equal length is a sufficient condition
There’s another way?