Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L
Posts
0
Comments
274
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Personen in Not überhaupt zu erkennen, ist schwieriger als gedacht. "Die meisten Menschen stellen sich Ertrinken falsch vor", sagt der erfahrene Rettungsschwimmer Carsten Kolberg. Das gängige Bild vom panisch schreienden Menschen, der mit den Armen fuchtelnd um Hilfe ruft, sei eher selten. In der Realität verlaufe Ertrinken meist still und unspektakulär. Die Betroffenen hätten oft nicht mehr die Kraft, sich bemerkbar zu machen. Sie verlieren langsam die Kontrolle, sacken ab, wirken orientierungslos.

    Extrem wichtig.

  • I'd say we eat almost everything. Aside from deep sea creatures, which are basically impossible to harvest for food, we tend to stay away from heavy poisonous species like the blue ringed octopus, poison arrow frogs, cone snails. But other than those pretty much anything goes.

  • Afaik humans eat all of those animals.

  • I don't know it just seems too on the nose, the ancient "expand the list" joke framework, picking a word that would become unintelligible when properly censored, then using the lazy censoring, censoring the first ass but leaving the second one untouched.

    I am honestly not sure if it's a joke or not, but it feels like one.

    Edit: maybe I just wanted it to be a meta joke, because the "expand the list" thing has run its course for me by now. Seeing it with the censoring removed makes it less funny for me, like a minions meme or something

  • I usually am annoyed by this self censoring bs but in this instance it feels like it's a meta joke on exactly this behavior.

  • That's what I was saying and it is very sad.

    You're that guy right now.

  • Yeah, that's how the entire entertainment business works, great observation, but that was never the point of contention here.

    You, angrily pissing on someones grave to feel morally superior to some Internet strangers is the point why I make fun of you.

  • Okay grandpa let's get you back to bed.

  • For trolling you have to sprinkle in more indifference, you're still trying too hard and come of as someone with anger issues.

  • Uh huh, you care so little you absolutely have to write several angry Internet comments. Very edgy indeed.

  • Edgy

  • Although I really like the analyses of the main guy; they are very sharp when Jones is rambling & deflecting.

    Adding to that: yes those moments are very enjoyable, but if you listen for longer you'll notice they are around a lot and the replies of dan and Jordan are in a vacuum, they have no impact on what is being rambled about. In those depositions there is actually a professional in the room, that either stops the rambling (there is a moment where one lawyer actually does a "bapbapbap I'm talking, not you" to Alex Jones), or they just deflate all the nonsense with a short remark like "in what way was this an answer to my question" or " do you know what question you are answering right now?". Oh and one of my favorites "that's a nice opinion to have, but not an answer to my question".

    I think it's formulaic objections #18 where Steven Crowders is questioned and he tries his "debate me bro" techniques a couple of times and just runs into a wall with his face first. Like, why would you try something like this with a lawyer that has been working your case for months and generally does that shit for a living, do you think there will be a "gotcha" moment, because there.will absolutely be not.

    And just for entertainment formulaic objections #3 is Roger Stone being deposed by a lawyer he has been aquatinted with for decades and they absolutely HATE each other, it's just perfect. Both of them are terrible people and it's just a delight listen to them being at each other's throats, but in a legal setting. One highlight is "did you just call me a little bitch?" - "well you certainly act like one". I laughed out loud more than once during this episode.

  • Oh yeah, Dans analyses is what carries this show. He is at his best when he is angrily swinging his Analysis like the sword of righteousness, those moments are just perfect.

  • Yes, for the most part. Obviously there are heavier topics and moments that require more sensitivity but their dynamic is pretty good reflected in the BtB episodes. I can't recommend them enough but I must advise some moderation, if you take too much of that stuff in at once it becomes quite a mental load.

    They have episodes titled 'Formulaic objections' which are commented versions of depositions, mainly from the sandy hook cases, but also others against characters from that universe and they are awesome. I sometimes take those as a sort of palette cleanser, because it is quite relieving to see those characters in a court setting, stripped of their usual ability to just deflect and ramble on.

  • Und was ist z.b. mit Scheuermilch oder Kokosmilch?

    Einverstanden

    In Leberkäse ist auch kein Käse drinnen, laut Google ist in "bayrischen" Leberkäse noch nicht mal Leber drinnen.

    Das kann man wenigstens etymologisch verargumentieren denn in Leberkäse war noch nie Käse drin. 'Kas' bezeichnet im altbaytischen eine essbare Masse (zb Kartoffelkäse für Kartoffelpüree). Und Leber leitet sich sehr wahrscheinlich von Laib ab, was auf die form hinweist, also eine "essbare Masse" (Kas/Käse) in Form eines Laibes gebacken (Lab/Leber). Die Lebensmittelhersteller mussten aufgrund des deutschen Lebensmittelbuches dann überall wo dieser Sprachgebrauch nicht geläufig ist tatsächlich Leber hinzufügen, es sei denn es wird explizit aufgedröselt oder man nennt es "bayrischen Leberkäs(e)" oder Fleischkäse o.ä. Immernoch etwas affig, aber wenigstens nicht ganz aus der Luft gegriffen.

  • Ich sehe das als gutes Zeichen, die Tierprodukte Industrie sieht die sprichwörtlichen Felle weg schwimmen und wie ein ertrinkender greift sie nach jedem Strohhalm, mag er auch noch so lächerlich sein.

    Ich glaube kaum, dass die Hafermilch Debatte zu Umsatzeinbußen der hafermilch-Hersteller geführt hat, es war eine lächerliche Diskussion, die nur noch mehr Aufmerksamkeit auf die Verfügbarkeit dieses alternativen Produktes gelenkt hat und dem Konsumenten ist doch nun wirklich egal ob Hafermilch oder Hafer "Drink" draufsteht.

    Grundsätzlich verstehe ich den Ansatz des Gesetzgebers auch treffende Bezeichnungen zu erzwingen, die klassische Tierprodukte Industrie unterliegt den gleichen Vorgaben, aber ob das ganze nun Milch ist oder etwas, dass zwar keine Milch ist aber genau so verwendet werden kann ist nun wirklich affig.

  • Happy anniversary, I love reading your content! Thank you for your dedication <3

  • Did someone say oxygen not included?

  • Also ich finde ja Zangendeutsch grundsätzlich schon grauenvoll, aber wenn dann sollte man auch konsequent bleiben - Mutterpfüger wäre Motherplower. Wenn man motherfucker also konsequent zangendeutschen möchte - fuck und fick sind verwandt, da aber bei Mutterficker der humoristische Wert verloren geht - ficken bedeutete ursprünglich etwas in etwas hineinstecken oder schieben, reiben, stoßen bzw beschreibt eine hin und her Bewegung. Mutterstecker, Mutterschieber, Mutterfeger, Mutterreiber , Mutterstoßer wäre alles adäquater meiner Meinung nach.