In OneDrive, no less. Daring.

Han “I don’t know the difference between distance and time” Solo?

Kind of like an open-source Evercade, then?

But if you know what you’re doing, you can do a better job than the “AI”…??? This is a weird argument

A phone that isn’t smart, probably

But they’re the sort of British that yearns for the good old days, when we still had shillings and inches and diphtheria and jumpers for goalposts and no womens’ rights and all that great British stuff.

How about a Tangara?

I’ve noticed quite a few other companies following suit now as well. It’s tiring.

Gotta be Tubelectric.

What’s the plan with Collins as a first name… for a girl, even? They just really big fans of latter-day Genesis in red states?

“…Fish??”

I have always maintained that Infinite would have made SO much more sense if it’d followed on directly from 3.

eekum bokum

We’re not in the abyss, we’re in the car park and snack area adjacent to the abyss. Not too bad.

Oh well.

I have. Nothing happened.

Are you sure? Doom was GPL’ed in 1999.

Finally, a keyboard for Sims!

The 80s called, they want their weird jokes back.

I get you. I think you’re right - if you have a page which does make heavy use of JS, it can be difficult if not.impossible to replicate the same behaviour without it. HOWEVER: you can often get something close enough!

To go back to my shop example: yes, you can use JS to show a richer shopping experience, with pop-up windows, filtering, and the ability to add to cart without leaving the page. Graceful degradation would be to show the same listings, but without the more convenient features that use JS - so without popups, with filtering that refreshes the page, and a completely separate cart.

Some apps really can’t function without JS, because they are… well, apps.