Would I be correct to assume one of the primary demands would be the recognition of these treaties, which would legally reinstate control or sovereignty over land stolen by the Federal government to the native signatories? Would this qualify as native sovereignty? Then again, I don’t assume to know better than those directly involved
Will check out the sources once I have some time, since they probably have direct answers to give. I have heard positive things about The Red Nation in the past.
That would require Europeans to acknowledge the damaging role of U.S. Imperialism, delegitimizing European participation in said imperialism among European citizens. Plus European Liberals are too proud (putting it nicely) to associate positively with an ‚autocratic‘ power such as the PRC. They’ve spent so long shitting on non-liberal projects that it becomes unthinkable to imagine any productive partnership with them that doesn’t involve either condemnation or confrontation.
Just joined Lemmy, and it’s genuinely a goldmine. Glad I‘m here
If it helps, I’m always interested in your comments, and your use of marxist theory in debates like these are enlightening to me :)