I didn't properly articulate this in my own comment, so thank you. Yes, the survey was done by an external source (again, I do personally agree with it's findings), I was just highlighting the source of the article commenting on it.
Different eyes looking at the same survey will see different things, and a journalist will highlight different things depending on a target audience. Given the Chinese domain (.cn) and English language, I personally assumed that it was focusing on highlighting improvements in Canadian general opinion towards Chinese trade and might downplay more neutral view points not to suppress them but because they're not necessarily relevant to the point of the article.
I view the article through the same lense I would view an American article or a German article on the same survey; as a third party commenting on a Canadian survey to bolster their own point. The important part is actually looking at the results of that Leger study (as you pointed out).
Agreeing with other comments, it is a Chinese domain and a Chinese news site so doesn't necessarily reflect Canada as a whole.
The article is talking about an n = 1570 study where 61% or people say they supported the trade deal with regards to EV (the article doesn't specify whether the canola export portion of the deal may have influenced perceptions). All in all, it's the other side of a trade deal pointing at roughly 1000 people saying they are for the deal and saying "see? Canada supports the deal".
All this said, had I been asked I would be in the "strongly support" camp (noted as 24% in the article). The EV tarrifs were not completely removed, but removed for up to 49000 total sales under a certain value per year. Those tariffs were put in place as a measure to a) dissuade the Americans from increasing tariffs against us and b) prevent cheaper Chinese EVs from undercutting Musk's market share. The tariffs were increased anyways and why should we continue supporting that piece of trash.
Do I think Chinese EVs will save the world? No. Do I think that China is an objectively good state? No. But I do think that removing those tariffs is a good thing.
I don't know what end of 20's you're at, but I'm in my late 20's. I have 3 younger siblings. The oldest of my siblings also did this, but the younger two did not. The third sibling would watch Youtube and stuff with friends on like a XBox, but not just browsing the web or playing flash games. By the time my youngest sibling was about that age, all of their friends had some form of internet connected device on their own. Whenever their friends would come over, they'd watch movies or play board games or other "in person activities", but not browse the web together.
50°F is when I might start wearing pants instead if shorts. I will still be wearing a t-shirt, and won't bring a jacket until at least 40°F.
70°F is the hottest it can be outside before I become uncomfortably warm.
When I get in a hot tub that is at 100°F, I will turn it down to at least 95°F and know that I won't be able to stay much longer.
This is the other problem with Fahrenheit, there is no universal "100% hot". While Celsius doesn't have the granularity and is subject to "just ask water how it feels" criticism, at least "what temperature is water" is a consistent way to explain it as opposed to saying "at 100°, you'll be hot"
Apparently this isn't the case anymore (according to my younger siblings) but only ~⅓ of my grad class at a Canadian high school was cishet.
Like straight up, most of us were some flavour of gay to the point that I knew people who had to come out as straight due to others assuming they were just bi.
I got to that chapter in the book (Chapter 10) and had to set the book down for a while. Not because it blew my mind or "expanded my understanding of reality", but because I though I might understand what he meant and knew that absolutely couldn't be the case.
The first 6 - 8 chapters are genuinely a great read, do a great job explaining all of the 'basics' of black holes at a level that most people can understand.
Growing up I discovered that there are two types of catholics. My church once had a temporary priest (our previous priest had just been sent on sabbatical and they didn't have a replacement lined up) reassigned because he gave back to back anti-abortion and homophobic homilies in two weeks and we weren't okay with that. The aforementioned previous priest routinely spoke in support of the queer community (usually just gay folks, but occasionally trans & beyond), talked about how we should be doing more to support the poor and underprivileged, and generally preacher a doctrine of love and tolerance.
But there are also Catholic groups who preach against all of that, believing that the word of the pope/gospel supersedes interpretation of it. My old roommate once genuinely said that "being gay is fine, it's just a sin to act on it". He went to a different church only about an hour from mine, yet they were being preached the near opposite of what I was. And as other users have mentioned, that rift can grow depending on exactly where you go in the church.
From what I understand of out pilot, most of what the users ended up using it for was pregenerating scripts that are effectively "copy > paste > tweak" dozens if not hundreds of times but can't be automated for one reason or another and then quickly checking the script for errors, as opposed to your pm/eng use cases, but I believe your sentiment holds true.
I don't use LLMs because I personally do not like them, so I don't really know where someone might think they fit best inside a workflow. But I can very easily see my self spending half an hour trying to get the perfect result by prompting rather than spend 10 minutes doing it myself because I tend to basically put on blinders once I start a task.
I don't use AI tools when I code (my work IDE is way too old & I prefer it that way), but elsewhere where I work they did a pilot of people trying Cursor for a number of months.
What they found was that it was useful as a first step in the process, but almost always required being checked by hand afterwards. Another thing was that "code efficiency" changes fell between 10% faster and 30% slower, averaging overall ~20% slower. But almost all participants reported feeling like they'd improved by 20% faster. It made them feel like they were working faster than they were, even though it seems to have been actively hindering them.
Neither. It's just pickle.