The ratio of bots to humans is significantly better on lemmy than on reddit. In fact that's another reason that the dork in OP is wrong about "no users," because absolute numbers don't matter very much if you're interested in conversations with actual human beings, what matters is the likelihood that it's just bots responding and upvoting (or the opposite) and with reddit your odds on that are shit.
- Posts
- 2
- Comments
- 79
- Joined
- 2 yr. ago
- Posts
- 2
- Comments
- 79
- Joined
- 2 yr. ago
you intentionally misinterpret EVERYTHING SOMEONE SAYS
When it comes to Hasan, you weirdos act like Destiny stans
it’s gross and unhinged, we get it, you’re all podcast millennials
Seriously get a grip
Have you ever heard the phrase "every accusation a confession"?
Pipe down, and keep your disingenuous accusations to yourself
Says the ignorant loudmouth who doesn't understand the very basic leftist concept of radicalism but can't stop shouting at everyone in caps how a progressive liberal streamer is more radical than unnamed indigenous MLs protecting people from ICE in the streets because the streamer is rich enough to get more people to listen to him. I can't believe this isn't just a really bad bit and that you're actually serious.
I critique someone’s over-the-top and unrealistic social expectations
A critique is when you tell someone who is housing and feeding homeless people that they aren't as radical as an internet personality Kamala Harris supporter because of "reach"
It’s genuinely wild I have to spell this shit out,
It's genuinely wild people have to spell out the definition including common use of the word radical to you, but instead of listen you insist on making up some bullshit argument in your head between materialism and idealism. True Anon also interviewed Sumud Flotilla survivors before and after their attempt to bring aid. Where do Brace Belden and Liz Franczak fit on your little "true radicals have reach while fake idealist not-radicals only house and feed a few homeless people at a time" spectrum?
Not at all comparable. And as has been pointed out elsewhere in this thread, testing rival airspaces with fighter planes has been a common even banal tactic used by a number of country's airforces, certainly including the US who has employed it countless times.
Even if a person were to concede, as you are insisting, that the US does not = NATO (though for all intents and purposes that is effectively true, let's set that aside for now), then that doesn't change the fact that when you said:
The only country NATO invaded was also invaded by Russia.
You were demonstrating a complete and shameful lack of historical knowledge. That statement is just a ridiculous, ahistorical lie. Formally, undeniably, admittedly even by NATO, these following countries have been invaded by NATO: Yugoslavia, Afghanistan (the only one you seem to be aware of), and Libya. And NATO as an organization admits to "indirect participation" in the invasion of Iraq.
So set aside your other petty derailment arguments about NATO not technically being the US and acknowledge that you were full of shit even before Iran, Korea, Vietnam, and Cuba were brought up.
Edit: Ok, I guess you can't acknowledge it, I see now that you were banned. Well I wasn't holding my breath you were going to anyway. lol
Isn't that all rUzZiAn DiSiNfOrMaTzIa though?
omg... That must mean ChatGPT is a Russian agent bot!
wtf, I love ChatGPT now?
This post is the one I was referring to when I used the word mandate, a post made by someone I believe was an admin at the time, but maybe not. But I also talked to someone at the time from there who was a frequent commenter in places like the lemmy c/worldnews comm and they were very angry about having their posts and comments removed, while others were banned. I checked the modlog and sure enough. I'm really not trying to stir shit, it's just something I'm sincerely curious about because it seemed so... off brand to me, to use a lib phrase.
Honest question, I thought hexbear had a mandate against "lionizing Luigi Mangione," but I have been seeing more hexbear users like u/QuietCupcake even in this thread posting emojis that I thought would have gotten them removed or worse last December. Is that why OP is posting it here with an .ml account even though (forgive and correct me if I'm wrong comrade) you're mostly a hexbear user? Did the mods there ever acknowledge the absurdity of that rule and roll it back, was it just quietly forgotten, or is it still selectively enforced? Don't get me wrong, I think hexbear is mostly a great instance that I often comment in solidarity with, but I was surprised to see what seemed like an extremely uncharacteristic liberal position they took on that.
Putin’s political opponents frequently fall out of windows or catch some polonium poisoning.
Hmm... I wonder what happened to the original leadership of BLM? And hey, what are Fred Hampton and Mark Clark up to these days? Has Gary Webb published any articles recently?
These things are not the same, and pretending they are, makes you blind to how much worse they can still get. Russia is absolutely more of a brutal dictatorship than even the US, but especially than most European countries.
Oh believe me, I am well aware how bad they can get, you're just completely unaware of how bad they've already been. You believe all these lies about how terrible Russia is, looking at it only through the lens that western propagandists have carefully cultivated for you without realizing that every accusation they've levied on their enemies is a confession about what they themselves have been doing all along. You're as intellectually domesticated by US imperialist interests as any diehard Kremlin-supporting Russian citizen, only you have the benefit of being on the side that enjoys global hegemony without even understanding what that word means. You're all up in arms about the lies of the media of an enemy state without having even an ounce of self awareness about the lies of the media you're consuming, the very same media from which you think you've learned how uniquely bad the enemy's media is.
SocDem is not right-wing by even the farthest stretch of the imagination
"Social Democracy objectively represents the moderate wing of Fascism." - J. V. Stalin
https://marxistleninist.wordpress.com/2010/04/13/bourgeois-democracy-and-fascism/
Even after the victory of fascism, the influence, ideology and traditions of Social Democracy continue their baleful and disorganising role, preventing the emergence of a united working class front to confront and defeat fascism. Further, if fascist dictatorship’s grip on power weakens, then Social Democracy stands in wait to come to the rescue of capitalism.
What is beyond doubt is that both Social Democracy and fascism are agents of monopoly capitalism; both fight tooth and nail against the struggle of the working class for its social emancipation. With this as their aim, both disrupt and weaken working-class organisations.
Their methods are, however, different. While fascism smashes the class organisations of the working class from without and opposes their whole basis and counters them with an alternative ‘national’ ideology, Social Democracy undermines them from within by diverting them along reformist bourgeois channels. Whereas fascism relies mainly on coercion, along with deception, Social Democracy relies mainly on deception, along with coercion. Their aims are identical; only their methods differ. In view of the identity of their aims and differing methods, one cannot but agree with Stalin’s observation, made as early as 1924, that “Social Democracy objectively represents the moderate wing of Fascism.” (Concerning the International Situation, Collected Works, vol 6, p.294)
Russia is no more a "brutal dictatorship" than the US is, or the UK, or any number of other capitalist shithole countries that call themselves "democracies." Russian state media is no worse than, for example, the BBC or CNN. But more importantly, it does not have the global reach that the BBC and CNN have. The key thing that you're utterly failing to understand here is that Russia does not have the global hegemony that the US has (and NATO in general, though NATO is just a collection of vassal states subservient to US capital). Russian state media cannot begin to compete on the global stage with the overwhelming stranglehold that western media has over not only their own domestic populations but the rest of the world. We here in the west are not saturated day in and day out by Russian propaganda, but we absolutely are by western capital (which is synonymous with US state) propaganda. Pretending like this is an even playing field is absurd and it's why no one here is taking your whining about eBiL RuZzIaN media seriously. It's not about "defending" Russian media, it's about recognizing geopolitical reality.
The "Every Accusation a Confession" rule of thumb strikes again.
Thank you for staying on top of this kind of shit and exposing them when necessary.
Appreciate the informative list of links! (Very common u/davel W).
Also lol at my comment being reported to mods as propaganda for stating a simple, verifiable fact. Always funny how the dronies think it's "propaganda" just for going against what they want to believe even when their beloved western sources reported on it back before it became no-no to do so. (A NATO No-No, if you will). I'd ask what instance the [redacted] reporter was from, but I guess that might give away exactly who it was.
The Eastern provinces that the neonazi-led Ukrainian government was ethnically cleansing, and who had been asking for Russia's help (and to join Russia) since long before February of of 2022? Yes. Yes, they should be Russia.
The "tankie" instances are the least likely to have bots. They're the most vehemently anti-AI and the moderators most active in banning any kind of bot-like activity. Hexbear, the one that all the dronies clutch their pearls about most and accuse of brigading the most doesn't even have downvotes - they are incapable of mass downvoting.
Diseases did not conquer hundreds of tribes.
Disease played a major role in the European's ability to conquer those tribes. It's not an either/or situation. It is true that the "Americas" that the English started colonizing had already been devastated by the contagions brought by the Spanish. The English undoubtedly would have found it far more difficult and maybe even impossible to conquer those hundreds of tribes had they not first been so severely depopulated by pandemic. Acknowledging this does not absolve or even lessen the atrocities committed by the English.
You’re a reactionary cosplaying as a leftist
Every accusation a confession.
I am fully convinced that a small number of users on this instance are here with the intention of making anarchists look bad, the intention to really drive in the nail (one crafted by the enemies of all of the left) that anarchism is the ideology of spoiled, tantrum-throwing children. Because that's how @masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com and a few others like them are behaving. Actual anarchism is not this, of course, but that's why I am so convinced that either these puerile users don't know what real anarchism is, or they do but are only pretending to be anarchists online to "troll" real leftists, be their targets Marxist-Leninist or real anarchists or any other genuine leftist tendency.
Anyone reading these exchanges (even lurking liberals) who have any experience interacting with their fellow humans, can immediately spot who in these threads are speaking in good faith, are interested in learning and understanding the world, interested in presenting valid evidence and reasoning for their beliefs (people like @CascadeOfLight@hexbear.net in this particular subthread), versus which other participants in this thread are acting completely, openly, and smugly in bad faith with no interest in either the truth or in learning, let alone any interest in having a real discussion, because they make it clear the only interest they have is "owning" opponents, or since they can't manage that, just being inflammatory and saying things we all know are absurd but are designed to cause upset even when it lays bare their own pathetic ignorance. Trolling, in other words. It is so blatantly obvious who is just here spewing whatever they can with the intent to make people angry. It doesn't have to be reflective of reality, they don't have to even make sense, they just say things in a transparent attempt to shit-fling.
I say let them keep at it, they will wear themselves out eventually, as conniption-having toddlers always do. But also because it is so obvious what they're doing, anyone watching from the sidelines, especially anyone "without a horse in this race" can see that the "tankies" and actual anarchists (like @Nakoichi@hexbear.net), at least in this thread, are the ones who know what they're talking about and have genuine convictions and a dedication to justice. I want to reiterate that (real) anarchists have these positive qualities too, but a select few of the cringe users in this thread like masquenox who claim to be anarchists should not be taken as being even remotely representative of what people who belong to that tendency are like or what they believe. The anarchists I know irl and consider friends and comrades wouldn't be caught dead associating with these tantrum-throwing, "tankie-hating" children.
Sounds like the sole source of your "education" was the willful swallowing of propaganda. It really is gross how these know-nothing sycophants for capitalism have infested lemmy. Capitalism is oligarchy, it always without fail trends towards monopoly no many how reformist "regulations" succdems try to throw at it. Communism (via socialism) not only does not lead to oligarchy, it is the only proven workable means of preventing it in a capitalist-dominated world. If you could pry your tongue off the capitalist's boot for few seconds you might be able to learn something about how the world actually works.