My wake-up call probably should have been when a member of my own family insisted that Christians are the most prosecuted people in the USA (this was circa 2024).
They're actually the third-most prosecuted group, after white hetero cis males, and gamers
Jesus, how far do you have to be down the panic hole to believe this stuff?
I like that none of my local devices are externally addressable unless an outgoing connection has been established.
This can also be achieved using (other) firewall rules.
but then it's essentially just maintaining a NAT table without the translation piece.
So... a firewall?
NAT isn't a security feature and shouldn't be relied on for managing access to hosts.
It also breaks the assumption of IP that connections between hosts are end-to-end, which requires sophisticated solutions so that everything works (more or less).
I too employ NAT to make services accessible over IPv4. But only because it doesn't work otherwise. Not because it "makes sense". I don't use it at all for IPv6.
Auch wenn Charlie Kirk ein rechstkonservativer Podcaster und Trump Anhänger war, rechtfertigt das nicht das Attentat auf ihn bzw. seinen Tod. Das ist meine ehrliche und womöglich unpopuläre Meinung dazu.
Er war kein "rechtskonservativer Podcaster", sondern rassistischer Faschist. Dazu halte ich das Framing für fragwürdig. Niemand, den ich kenne, hat Bock auf das politische Klima, das von Gewalt bestimmt wird. Aber es entbehrt eben nicht einer gewissen Ironie und ggf. Schadenfreude, wenn es demjenigen ins Gesicht schlägt, der es herbeigeführt hat.
Lol that one subreddit also equated the two. Smallface will be forgotten within a year, he had no memorable message that people would rally behind. Anyone can spew his kind of hate, just needs a bit of training to beat some highschoolers in shitty debates. "Owning the libs" and using dog whistles is nothing that will make you more than some footnote.
It's a weird case. As the paper says, this is inherent to LLMs. They have no concept of true and false, and rather produce probabilistic word streams. So is producing an untrue statement an error? Not really. Given these inputs (training data, model parameters and quiet), it's correct. But it's also definitely not a "hallucination", that's a disingenuous bogus term.
The problem however is that we pretend these probabilistic language approaches are somehow a general fit for the programs they're put in place to solve.
Ich bin diese Beiträge langsam leid. Es geht nicht, egal wie oft man als Feuilletonist darüber schreibt. Fast jede Pflicht zur Arbeit ist Zwangsarbeit, und ein solches Jahr würde darunter fallen. Gibt es auch entsprechende Gutachten zu.
Das einzige, was ich sehe, wäre die Verweigerung der Wehrpflicht zu vereinfachen (quasi ein Ankreuzfeld "ich verweigere aus Gewissensgründen", wo dann nicht weiter ausgeführt werden muss).
When I hear Nazi I think of concentration camps and killing Jews. Kirk was a big supporter of Israel.
Well, Israel didn't exist when the NSDAP did, so if you apply the literal meaning of each, a Nazi couldn't support Israel. But fascism was also something that only applied to the party in power in Italy from 1922 to 1945. The terms have somewhat evolved since then; fascism generally meaning authoritarian, ultranationalistic and antiliberal. The same applies to nazism, but usually with some racist ideology with hatred for other religions.
Nah, it's the same playbook every time. You have dangerous right wing rhetoric justifying violence (as seen in this thread, even by Kirk himself) that leads to political violence and the right is just "this is deserved" (see J6 or the attack on democratic lawmakers), but when it hits themselves, suddenly political violence is the worst and collective pearl-clutching starts. These people have created a dangerous atmosphere that they can't control and it's backfiring, there was never an attempt from them to defuse it.
People like Kevin Roberts who threaten revolutions with thinly veiled violence etc… btw my personal theory is that Kirk was shot by a right wing lunatic who was disappointed in Kirk's 180 on the Epstein files which went from something like "this is the biggest conspiracy in history, never trust the government" to "I trust my friends in the government" over a weekend. They have created an atmosphere of "you need to fight those in power by any means necessary" and now they find themselves in an awkward spot.
Anyhow, everybody in the thread you replied to just did what Kirk ask them to. Not show empathy, not let the victims emotionally hijack the narrative. He made the world a worse place, I don't know if it's gonna be better without him but I have no reason to believe otherwise.
They're actually the third-most prosecuted group, after white hetero cis males, and gamers
Jesus, how far do you have to be down the panic hole to believe this stuff?