• 0 Posts
  • 103 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle




  • Care to back that up? You wouldn’t need a license to do something that copyright laws already allow you to do on their own. For example, making additional copies for your own personal use is perfectly legal, if allowed depends on your local fair use or private copying exemption law (provided you do it without circumventing DRM, e.g. via the analog hole), even though of course the movie studio wouldn’t give you a license for that.

    Of course, DRM is the real issue here, as due to anti-circumvention the movie industry controls who can legally make players for movies on DVD/Blu-Ray (unlike on VHS and CD).

    You can’t rent your copy of Shrek out to people

    That’s literally how Netflix got started.












  • The problem is, YouTube has no real competition. No one has the same thing they do. And the same applies to a lot of things today.

    Another issue is, subscription services can just raise the price and then start charging people more without those people doing anything, or possibly even noticing, which differs from individual purchases where you had to make a judgement about the price each time. Now, people have to make an actively cancel in order to not agree to new prices (or EULA changes for that matter). It should really be the other way around, so that if a service raises their price, people have to actively agree to the new price in order for the service to keep charging them.

    Can’t speak for Uber Eats or Starbucks though.