Left of rei. Likely her twin sister Ram is to the left of her, but iirc they have different color hairbands so it's probably just two copies of Rem, so like [Rem, Rem, Rei]
Based on their response habits, it's likely a poorly made AI or a 13 year old kid. Not worth interacting with it cuz either: it is incable or caring, or they really aren't supposed to be here and we really shouldn't welcome children into adult spaces by allowing them into the conversation. If they don't wanna have discussion, then why would they contribute to conversation when spoken to?
Since you believe this stems from your personal perceptions and observations, the answer likely involves a paradigm shift that random people on the internet can't realistically assist with beyond basic advice. Whenever I'm stuck on a problem and I don't know where to go, a good place to start is collect more data and widen your research. Good luck o7.
My favorite part, is that ALL of the current AI companion products use subscriptions to LLM services instead of having built in models.
Which means ifwhen the company stops paying their bill, or if the AI company goes under, your waifus goes kaput. Or more likely just restructuring because of a buyout. It's already happened with a few companies -> big tech buys out the company then stops supporting the product line, that then customers get mad. IIRC, coincidentally HP is being sue for doing just that with some recent buyout right now lmao.
The ante seems to get upped each time, and there exists at least one unstable lonely maniac that will not consider legal consequences to their actions when they are suddenly rugpulled out of their unhealthy addictive relationship, so there's still room for the bubble to burst in an even more epic crash.
Your account is not your posts. Why would one assume that deleting the account would remove the posts? When a person stops speaking the things they said do not become unsaid. When they die their actions don't retroactively undo themselves.
Oh man I'll try, but I can't make any promises ...
Modern particle physics breaks particles down into two groups: Dice that are weighted (bosons) and Dice that aren't weighted but also aren't fair (fermions).
Bosons always roll the same number, because they're weighted.
Fermions always roll numbers, but we have no clue how many sides they have, or what numbers they can even roll because they change each time we roll them.
Classical Computers ignore this problem. They just count the number of dice they have, and are really really good at rolling precise amounts of dice and putting them into specific labelled jars. Their math works by carefully keeping these jars organized, and are limited by how quickly and accurately the CPU can organize amounts of dice.
It turns out if you roll a set of dice enough times, no matter what set of dice you use as long as they are random, you eventually wind up with a similar looking "standard distribution" of probabilities. Quantum computers let us zero out the dice to a fixed starting position, kind of like zeroing out a scale, and then we can use that to make calculations. This process is very sensitive and difficult and has a lot of scaling issues.
Enter Anti-Dice. Anti-Dice are the polar opposites of existing Dice. They are just like all the other particles but they have their numbers printed upside down, and their shapes are inverted.
A Majorana particle is a particle that takes this metaphor even Further BEYOND!!! It is a type of Fermion (dice that we can roll and will give us random numbers instead of the same number each time), but whenever we roll a Majorana particle it turns into its own Anti-Dice. This is a really cool concept that Microsoft is using here as a proof of concept to make a quantum computer that is easier to scale up, because now if we roll say a bunch of 6s and a bunch of -6s, we know it's actually supposed to be the same number because of how Majorana particles are defined, and we can theoretically use this cheaper and easier method to scale up a quantum chip.
Yes, they could remain private but they are attempting to go public. This action is a legal speedbump that they must now work really hard to maneuver around.
They haven't changed. The party leaders back then were the same as they are now. They were never on your side. No political party is your friend, no political party will ever be your friend, and no political party will ever put your best interests forst.
THEY don't need to do anything, WE need to stop supporting political parties that abandon their constituents.
This is corporate trolling. Open AI is trying to go public soon, and Elon did this to fuck with that.
Massive oversimplification but basically:
In the United States, you are required to take the best offer when selling a company, unless you can argue in court that you had reasons not to sell to whomever placed the highest bid.
Because of this offer, as open AI attempts to go public, they will have to either to be close to Elon's bid, forced to sell to him, go to court and fight him ther, or be forced to remain private.
It's almost like they're all part of the same club, despite calling themselves different political parties.
It's almost like there can be things that exist in this universe which have one side, and then you can flip it over and it has another totally different side, but it's still the same object regardless of which face it's showing.
I for one am quite disappointed we didn't get to enjoy this dumpster fire for a week or two. An NFT extraction shooter would have some of the most sophisticated cheats and bots gaming has ever seen built for it within a week. Also the eventual market crash this game would have would've been interesting to see. Not to mention the friendships ruined over losing a round of a video game where actual life changing money is on the line.
NNOOOOOOOO. Don't grind the market before you are ready to drink it! It'll lose all the freshness!!