Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
373
Joined
3 yr. ago

Formerly /u/neoKushan on reddit

  • Yeah I checked the twitter profiles of the two people mentioned, one doesnt talk about it at all and the other says it's not what people think and it won't enable CFW.

    AI nonsense.

  • It's really not. Literally the same thing happened with the PS3, arguably that was much worse and it didn't cook Sony at all.

  • No because apple bought up almost the entire 2026 allocation.

  • One of the largest ISP's in the UK (virgin media) still doesn't support IPv6.

  • I wish you knew what the word "our" means, let me try one more time because you are funny.

    If you hear (or read) the word "our", in public, private, on the internet, off the internet, at the gas station, at the bus stop, on your phone, or on your laptop...

    ...and it doesn't pertain to you... The speaker (or writer) is not referring to YOU. Do you understand?

    I mean, ignoring the fact that this is a completely nonsense statement, even by your own logic it falls apart because your [https://old.lemmy.world/comment/21069429](original comment) was:

    *You're both out of control, our parties should be dismantled and dissolved.

    Next you'll be trying to tell me that if someone address you directly and says "you", they're not actually talking to you.

    Also, your "upvote theory" is a logical fallacy known as "argumentum ad populum"; a theory is not necessarily true just because people think so.

    That would be true if my "upvote theory" was "I got more upvotes so what I said must be true", but as a reminder you claimed:

    should you do this in public ANYWHERE on earth, you will be looked at with distaste.

    and the upvotes are in fact imperical data that the comment was not looked at with distaste. You should study up on your logical fallacies more, because you do not understand them.

  • A public conversation on the international internet, yes. You still seem to think that a public conversation can only involve specific parts of that public. It's like you don't understand the meaning of the word "public" or how the internet works.

    Also given the fact that my comment has a positive ratio of upvotes, that would suggest your own theory about how I should be "looked at in distaste" doesn't hold water, either.

    Once again, pubic or private setting, you made an assumption and that assumption was incorrect.

  • A thread about US politics on a worldwide facing thing called the internet. On a platform that is by design decentralised.

    You cannot fathom that this isn't a restaurant, it's the internet and people on the internet are from all over the world.

    Even now you're doubling and tripling down acting like I've interrupted some private discussion with your friends because the alternative makes you look incredibly silly.

  • The problem is you can just buy the $1000 TV you actually want and a $50 Android TV box to get the best of both worlds.

    Now if only there was better competition on that Steaming box front.

  • You assumed I was American and supported a certain political party. Did you forget?

  • Or, just saying, how about you don't babe assumptions about people's politics? To save yourself the embarrassment 😉

  • Oh are non Americans not allowed to talk about US politics, is that how it works?

  • Well. I'm not American, so....

  • "our" parties?

  • But remember, the conservatives are better because they don't celebrate the deaths of people they don't like, unlike the left who made light of Charlie Kirk's death.

  • I agree it's a wonderful game and it deserves recognition, but I also agree it's not as good as BG3. The thing is, that doesn't detract from any of it's awards this year because it was only competing with the games that came out in 2025, not the ones that came out in 2023.

    Had BG3 and Clair Obscura come out at the same time, I think the split in awards would have been very different.

  • The early days were actually great. People renting out spare rooms for cheap was a win/win, but of course "entrepreneurs" had to turn that into a side business and AirBnB had to maximise profits so it all went to shit.

  • Yeah it's fucking stupid because this is actually one of those annoying niche areas where LLM's might actually be useful. A lot of lawyering is studying prior case law; if you can find a prior case that's similar to yours and had the desired outcome, that's a very strong argument for you case.

    An LLM could easily parse millions of prior cases much faster than a human could, all they needed to do was actually fact check the results - the easiest part of it. But no they just took it as gospel because they're shitty lawyers.

  • It's entirely hypothetical. Jellyfin could also close source tomorrow, hypothetically (It happened with Emby so there's precedent).

  • This is a "slippery slope' argument and thus a fallacy.

    Let users decide how they want to run their own stuff. Right now if you have Plex pass this isn't an issue. If it becomes an issue, then you're in the exact same position you'd be in today if you decided to move away from Plex now.

    I moved away from Plex years ago, but I don't blame users for sticking with it, it still has a lot of advantages over jellyfin.

    EDIT: Y'all are trippin' over yourselves to complain about what other people choose to deploy on their own hardware.