I'm guessing it's the latter, they need to keep accidents to a minimum if they're ever going to get broad legislation to legalise them.
Every single accident is analysed to death by the media and onlookers alike, with a large group of people wanting it to fail.
This is a prime example, we've known about the human intervention for a while now but period people seem surprised that those people are in another country.
I wonder if this is a regional thing? Dominoes in the UK has had stuffed crust for at least a decade of not longer. At one point they had got dog stuffed crust too, it was divine.
It's not really the same thing today as it was 15 years ago. It also hasn't been running continuously that whole time. They regularly stop experimenting to build new extensions onto it.
I visited the LHC back in 2019 and at the time they were expanding it even then.
I'm not saying he was a good person, but the logic of "they deserve it" applies on both sides, even if one side is disproportionate to the other.
Kirk deserved it for the horrid shit he said and the vitriol he spread, I can absolutely see some right winger saying someone else deserves it for living in the dem part of town or looking a bit gay.
It's too late, it's already starting to happen. People are already having to dodge ice just while going to work, Charlie Kirk literal got sniped while at work.
Superior technology does not necessarily mean a superior product. History has plenty of examples where the inferior technology won out because the majority of people don't care about having the best or most advanced technology, they want the easiest, cheapest and (most importantly) lowest effort.
To be clear, I don't think digg is a superior product either, I'm just saying that how good the tech is matters far less than people want to believe. What truly matters is the implementation.
He's a means to an end for those that want to do whatever the fuck they like. Can him the smartest man you've ever met, throw him some pocket change and give him a fake trophy, he'll do whatever you tell him.
Have you seen the lengths people go to in order to not have to change their world view even a smidge? To not have to correct themselves about anything at all? I'll give you a hint, literally every right wing party in the world doing well is because weak people can't change a damn thing about themselves.
You absolutely did make an assumption because you addressed me directly and started talking about "our" parties, there's no two ways about it. I'll keep quoting your exact words here:
You're both out of control, our parties should be dismantled and dissolved.
There's no world where you're not addressing me directly and making assertions about "our" political party here. Everything else is irrelevant and you're doing a terrible job at trying to save face.
Yeah but the problem here is you made a huge assumption about who I am, who I represent and which political party I form a part of. You addressed me as such and when I pointed out your assumption was way off, now you're trying to argue about pronouns and semantics of conversations.
I'll keep bringing it back to this core point, you made a silly assumption and just can't admit it. It's as hilarious as it is sad.
What difference does it make if you were addressing me singularly or plurally? You were still addressing me. You can't claim that you were both addressing me and not addressing me at exactly the same time. Pick a lane and stick to it.
I'm guessing it's the latter, they need to keep accidents to a minimum if they're ever going to get broad legislation to legalise them.
Every single accident is analysed to death by the media and onlookers alike, with a large group of people wanting it to fail.
This is a prime example, we've known about the human intervention for a while now but period people seem surprised that those people are in another country.