I was a TikTok lurker for a couple years. The app is plagued with misinfo and low IQ slop, but this unregulated nature also made it one of the best sources for things that mainstream media ignored.
A good chunk of my algorithm was news about Palestine. Recently, suddenly, it all disappeared. Poof no more Palestine info, here's some Israeli propaganda instead. Their moderation policy changed, so any comments with mild criticism of Israel were deleted. Discussion of Israel's crimes will get your account striked and banned.
I can only assume this trend will be even worse with disgusting Zionist Larry Ellison bankrolling it.
Well I'm honestly curious what your intention is when you "inform" these non voters of their mistake.
Is it all about emotional release? Or do you honestly believe that you can shame these voters into voting correctly next time?
Why is your focus on this tiny subset of voters, and not focused on Trump voters?
From my standpoint, you're just doing more damage to the already fractured Democratic Party base. Damaging the Democratic Party is helping Trump win a third term.
Your TNR article correctly asserts that Dems lost because they failed to motivate their base. It is explaining how the Democratic Party's policies on the economy and immigration had a strong negative effect on voter turnout.
It says nothing about protest voters, and only a passing mention of Gaza. I was under the impression that "protest non voters" referred explicitly to those voters who concerned themselves with the genocide in Palestine.
If you expand the scope of "protest non voters" to include those who didn't vote due to the economy or immigration policy, then I agree with you completely.
Yea and I'm informing Chester A Arthur voters about what they voted for lol
The difference is that Arthur voters have more blame on their shoulders, because they actually changed the outcome of an election, unlike "protest non-voters".
Yeah that era of comedians and pundits had a thing about "frivolous lawsuits". It's a conservative talking point, similar to how modern comedians whinge about cancel culture and trans rights.
I think they were dead wrong, lawsuits protect us all from corporate malfeasance. The grandma that had her genitals melted off by McDonald's boiling hot coffee deserved even more money, and none of public ridicule.
The examples I cited are being degraded and hollowed out before our eyes. That should give us even more reason to attempt to safeguard them.
Maybe I'm naive for being a bit hopeful, but I'm no Fukuyama. I understand that the system is crumbling, and that the core of the system is irredeemable.
None of that changes the fact that regulations like the Clean Air Act are a good thing. Yes, it should have done more to regulate coal emissions. Yes, it was unilaterally dismantled by Trump. It is still a good thing; nihilism on this subject is counter productive; and that is really my entire thesis here.
Regulations are just a tool and all tools can be misused. I'm definitely not here to suggest regulations are perfect or that they can solve all of our problems.
It feels like an insult to myself and the audience to assume that we aren't all aware of regulatory capture.
Signs of cynicism are great; the reasons for cynicism are obvious. But there is a big gap between healthy cynicism and the blackpilled doomerism that you are displaying.
Regulations give us the weekend and overtime pay. Regulations control how much rat shit is allowed in your food. Regulations make it so your workplace isn't a deathtrap. Those are all meaningful checks on capital.
Labor leaders fought in the streets, killed cops, and died for regulations.
If you're ever lucky enough to get selected for jury duty on an "assault on a federal officer" case, then I believe it is your civic duty to acquit, no matter the evidence.
You've heard of the Orphan Crushing Machine, now announcing the machine that temporarily stops the Orphan Crushing Machine (it is powered by crushed orphans)
As an unemployed CS grad, I think most of us understand the risks of cybercrime. Developing an illegal platform that generates enough income to live off of, while avoiding the authorities and living in a first world nation, is something very few people can pull off.
What I see in my unemployed peers is a proclivity to simply give up. For many this means rotting in their parents basement, for many others it means suicide. The ones who continue to struggle through dead-end jobs openly display violent fantasies, sexual depravity, support for fascism, and other deeply concerning antisocial behavior.
When the meme is in a digital format, then yes you can cut and paste.
Memes live in many formats though. Everything you have ever said is a meme in an audio format. Every thought you've ever had is a meme in the "thought" format. I'm not sure how you might crispr those.
There are many different accepted methodologies for measuring unemployment. For some reason the media only focuses on the U-3 value, and I agree that is highly misleading.
It sounds like the relevant statistic you are looking for is the U-6 value. U-6 is currently measured at a relative high of 8.7%. That is 30 million Americans who are unemployed or underemployed.
I was a TikTok lurker for a couple years. The app is plagued with misinfo and low IQ slop, but this unregulated nature also made it one of the best sources for things that mainstream media ignored.
A good chunk of my algorithm was news about Palestine. Recently, suddenly, it all disappeared. Poof no more Palestine info, here's some Israeli propaganda instead. Their moderation policy changed, so any comments with mild criticism of Israel were deleted. Discussion of Israel's crimes will get your account striked and banned.
I can only assume this trend will be even worse with disgusting Zionist Larry Ellison bankrolling it.