Skip Navigation

Posts
26
Comments
1361
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I'm not sure if you expanded over broader society, but people of public institutions not making (public/visible) political remarks has good reasons: As representatives of the public institutions which are supposed to serve all citizens it's important they are seen and trusted to be neutral and serving the state, the public, everyone.

    If public servants talk one way or the other, others may lose trust.

    Obviously, right now people are losing trust, and for good reasons, for other reasons and prevalence.

  • "What President Trump is trying to do is to balance and shift the burden of Europe's security to European allies, instead of to American taxpayers, plumbers and hard-working people in my home state of Iowa and other states,"

    After the first half I would have commented "coping or lying", but with the second half - yeah, they're definitely lying. It's their default, their standard lying. Publicly saying one thing, and doing entirely unrelated or opposite things.

    This should always be called and labelled what it is. Not strange remarks, irritations, or whatever. Manipulative, oppressive lies, manipulation, propaganda. Their lying and doublespeak is just like Putin. And in terms of actions, we must not expect anything else, no more trustworthiness or reliability.

  • I think they'd be great for distraction and irritation, but at the same time, they're not as god for signaling and alarming, and, I would imagine, would desensitize us to human screams.

  • With enough body fat, sprinkle in a bit of electrolyte and maybe vitamins and that's all you need.

    I remember reading of a supervised case like that, many months of not a year. I couldn't find it with a quick search.

  • Ob die Kunst, wenn sie schlecht oder billig aussieht, dann auch günstig war, bin ich ja etwas skeptisch. Diesen Zusammenhang muss es zumindest nicht geben, und gibt es häufig bestimmt auch gegenteilig.

  • Ich finde Bepflanzung schöner als Kunst. Oder wenn Kunst, dann lieber naturnah.

    Die Abwesenheit von Gegenständen macht es ja auch nicht schlechter. Dass man mit dem Platz etwas "anfangen" muss, ist nicht notwendig.

    Wenn man über den Kreisel sehen kann und sich im Verkehr besser orientieren kann finde ich das auch nicht schlecht.

  • Stimmt. Statt anderer Politiker und Parteien ist das Feindbild jetzt der Bürger. Irre.

  • Die, die das Geld wirklich brauchen, geben es dann auch direkt aus und kurbeln damit die Wirtschaft an. Auf die sozial Schwachen zu hetzen und abzubauen ist das Gegenteil von dem, was man tun sollte.

  • Pride makes you part of the system. Gatefulness puts you outside of it. It may seem pointless to weigh between the two terms, but surely it is sourced from mindset and influences the mindset.

    We don't control or significantly influence the system individually. Still, it's important to take ownership and control, even if it's only in the very small, even if it's just being a good citizen, even if it's just being friendly or supportive of other people. Especially for a diverse, collaborative, and democratic system like Europe it's important we see ourselves not as passive receivers but as active parts.

    Being a part of the system is enough to be proud as long as you're not actively working on destroying it. Even if it's small, even if it's just being friendly to others, participating is upholding.

    If we don't see ourselves as active parts of the system, others will influence and change it. The biggest risk is those who have the motivation and capability (be it position, influence, or money) will erode it.

  • Our biggest strength now is predictability and safety through social, political, and justice systems. Diverse collaboration on fair and safe ground has competitive and collective gain advantages.

    Our biggest systematic risks on these unique advantages are deteriorating social systems (including the distribution of wealth) and attacks on basic rights and protections, as well as systematic inertness.

    China can compete in many things, especially scale and production. But can it hold onto stability and innovation after tech has been stolen, corruption and nepotism are systemic issues, and bubbles like their real estate construction or pandemic handling are over? How well off will the average citizen be, materially, mentally, socially, and deterministically safe?

    Regarding "above fair price" - the problem is currency and labor cost discrepancies. Europe can't match low income production on price. I don't know if that was your point, but "fair price" is different depending on the source and depending on which side of the provider and buyer you view from. If you were addressing systematic costs that should be lowered, then I don't see that from the statement.

    A lot depends on the economy, but if Europe can stand its ground and transform into a self-sufficient union, it's not missing anything that would prevent keeping its strength and collective citizen upsides/goodness. Europe doesn't have to produce the cheapest goods or be able to export as successfully if it shifts its economic system and political goals.

  • Does it work for people with first name Al?

  • forgetting to redact credentials that made it possible for all of Reddit to log into Epstein’s account and trample over all the evidence

    /o\ 🤦

  • These statistics have people on the edge!

  • It was physical books?

  • It's insane to me that you claim it doesn't allow internal corruption when China is a very corrupt system.

    There may be good systematic economy foundations, I can't speak much about those, but if they're not applied to everyone and just then it's besides the point.

  • This would be a great cause for universities and students for pushing political reforms. Hindering education and development are good catchers for politics.

  • Honestly it's good engineering practice to not be stuck in your own product.

    You want them to be using only copilot?

  • For copilot in visual studio at least you can select between models it will use, depending on the org setup showing them.

    I don't see how "worst of all of them" applies when it's an umbrella of other models.

    Maybe we're all taking about different copilots. There's multiple products after all.

  • Yes, that's the safe way. Uninstall, download current version, install. That's it.

    Outside of being compromised already where you would have to notice and fix outside of notepad anyway. But that seems unlikely given the selective attack nature the hoster was able to confirm. If you'd want to cover that you would have to know and do a lot more.

  • It's not game over regardless if the updater checks a signature of the update installer. Then it wouldn't run an installer by someone else.

  • DACH - Deutschsprachige Community für Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz @feddit.org

    Karte öffentlicher Bücherschränke

    www.lesestunden.de /karte-oeffentlicher-buecherschraenke/
  • DACH - Deutschsprachige Community für Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz @feddit.org

    Monopolkommission: Warum die Bahn zerschlagen werden sollte

    www.tagesschau.de /wirtschaft/konjunktur/bahn-zerschlagung-puenktlichkeit-monopolkommission-100.html
  • DACH - Deutschsprachige Community für Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz @feddit.org

    Fliegerbombe am Magneten

  • Netzkultur / Netzpolitik @feddit.org

    Strategien rechter Influencerinnen: Nur auf den ersten Blick harmlos

    www.tagesschau.de /investigativ/rechte-influencerinnen-100.html
  • DACH - Deutschsprachige Community für Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz @feddit.org

    Strategien rechter Influencerinnen: Nur auf den ersten Blick harmlos

    www.tagesschau.de /investigativ/rechte-influencerinnen-100.html
  • Netzkultur / Netzpolitik @feddit.org

    Beschäftigtendatenschutz: KI als Katalysator für Überwachung am Arbeitsplatz

    netzpolitik.org /2024/beschaeftigtendatenschutz-ki-als-katalysator-fuer-ueberwachung-am-arbeitsplatz/