I haven’t heard or read any such thing, and the EU passed legislation regarding AI regulation. Which seems like the opposite of those claims.

I really don’t see how it’s a dishonest question.

Alternative: go-away

They were shouted down and called Luddites.

By whom and where?

Challenging unbalanced mindsets may be important or even necessary, though.

Are you talking about a specific company or AI in general? Because first it sounded like the latter, but now it sounds like the former.

I’ve always been surprised by cost numbers mentioned in services and donation requests.

I run my own cheap server which has game servers running in the past, and some other services. I’ve not run any busy services though or fediverse content so I never felt like I could make a reasonable assessment. Just be surprised.

However U.S. law puts the copyright in the hands of the creator of it, NOT Reddit.

Users give Reddit a license to handle and publish the comments under their terms. I don’t remember the specific terms. It may allow Reddit to pursue this, specifically when the content is being consumed from Reddit.

It does show that it can be a useful tool, though.

Here, the security researcher was evaluating it and stumbled upon a previously undiscovered security bug. Obviously, they didn’t let the AI create the bug report without understanding it. They verified the answer and took action themselves, presumably analyzing, verifying, and reporting in a professional and respectful way.

The cURL AI spam is an issue at the opposite side of that. But doesn’t really tell us anything about capabilities. It tells us more about people. In my eyes, at least.

Should posts like this have [Satire] added to the title?

I’d prefer them to be obvious. Just like we title posts to describe them, and put them into communities, mark them nsfw or not, whether it’s satire or not is an important differentiator.

Seeing him on German TV in a documentary was surprising.

Given uBlock Origin and Firefox native privacy functionality, what do you install and use Privacy Badger for? Isn’t there nothing left for it to do?

There’s a public petition - separate from the employee petition

Microsoft continues to provide the Israeli military with Azure cloud and AI services that are crucial in empowering and accelerating Israel’s genocidal efforts targeting Palestinians.

via petition text

https://www.972mag.com/cloud-israeli-army-gaza-amazon-google-microsoft/

‘Order from Amazon’: How tech giants are storing mass data for Israel’s war

The Israeli army is using Amazon’s cloud service to store surveillance information on Gaza’s population, while procuring further AI tools from Google and Microsoft for military purposes, an investigation reveals.

https://scribe.rip/@notechforapartheid/a-marriage-made-in-hell-an-introduction-to-microsofts-complicity-in-apartheid-and-genocide-d7dfad65a196

Is every single Israeli resident complicit in what their government is doing? None of them should be allowed to use Windows?

This is not about Israeli citizens using Windows. This is about Microsoft’s contracts with the Israeli military and government.

When he died he called it…? I assume before he died?

Seems like that would be the engineered high effort version that I don’t think spammers would invest.

Is there a need to manipulate moderators? I don’t think so. Unless you have a specific target and don’t mind the effort.

Otherwise, I suspect simple spam works well enough, with lower effort.

Pocket has helped millions save articles and discover stories worth reading. But the way people save and consume content on the web has evolved, so we’re channeling our resources into projects that better match browsing habits today. Discovery also continues to evolve; Pocket helped shape the curated content recommendations you already see in Firefox, and that experience will keep getting better. Meanwhile, new features like Tab Groups and enhanced bookmarks now provide built-in ways to manage reading lists easily.

What’s the discovery replacement they are referring to here?

a user pretending to espouse paranoid delusions received reinforcement from GPT-4o, which praised their supposed clarity and self-trust

This may be the next big sabotage of society.

Algo-driven unregulated social media pushed negative views, division, misinformation, while opening the platforms to manipulative content producers and connecting positive as well as negative influences (like finding communities of extremism).

If unregulated AI interfaces get pushed to people, they will not critically verify, but be confirmed in their own and the AIs biases, without any obvious indicators that this is happening.

Good thing we see some kinds of positive regulation. Like them pulling this model, interfaces adding disclosures of AI and uncertainty, and regulation by law.

I don’t see how that defies Trump. Trump is and was not part of negotiations or deals between these parties.

👋

uBlock Origin still functions the same. I doubt it’ll die in the foreseeable future because there’s interest in it, and moreso than in NoScript (my assumption anyway).

The uBlock Origin introduced https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home to cover the manifest v3. It’s a separate software. The original uBlock Origin remains functional like before.

Regarding the earlier point, this lite FAQ entry sounds to me like the main author is more committed to origin than lite.