I've thought about this before, and it gave me an interesting thought process: AI can't ever be good at doing a large project.
It has a hard limit. Not only is it not as good as us, the best it can ever do is as good as us, and we're not even good at it. That's all it can be trained on! Our garbage code lol
Pentium III? Oh man, the cleanup is getting close to affecting me.
I have a Pentium 4 PC (an old Dell Optiplex that originally ran XP). It still runs modern Linux straight from the distro download page without any other set up needed bc it's an early 64-bit CPU
But maybe soon it will lose support for some other reason like a driver losing support.
I mean distro only matters in so much as it's how you get software.
Arch or Arch-based distros (except Manjaro) are nice for Nvidia bc you're always on the latest drivers and latest wine and latest Niri. Mainly bc you get bug fixes and new features early.
That's what I use.
Fedora is like that too, but Fedora tends to organize the system in a non-standard way, so I don't use it. Tried for a few months. Ran into weird issues where I ended up needing to just build kernel and nvidia myself bc the COPR and main repo options just... didn't work.
Nix can do it too but you have to deal with the static, immutable nature of everything. I like the centralized config nature but some apps just don't work immutably.
Ubuntu and Debian distros can do it, but you might have to tweak more since they're more stable and may not have the latest driver which you may need.
So I mean, they can all be tweaked to get the software you need. I like Arch bc of the AUR, up-to-date software, extensive documentation, and standard design, but then the risk is every now and then it's "too up-to-date" and you get a regression, and for some people that's too big a problem, even if it rarely happens.
I've found it varies from compositor to compositor:
Plasma? Mid on Nvidia
Constantly I have issues and I can't even solve them myself
I have plasma working on Ubuntu Studio on a laptop I use for music making which has some Nvidia card, and that works fine, but not on my main Arch install
GNOME? Works okay until you want to do something with portals like screen recording
Even if I use a different portal, GNOME overrides it.
Hyprland? Works amazing EXCEPT for random tiny issues
Also I had to do a lot of tweaking
Every now and then some program will not start or something
But generally pretty good
Sway? Garbo support
Nvidia may not even boot. Lots of tweaking. Lots of issues
Cosmic? For wayland - solid
For everything else... it needs a little work still
I also tried Cosmic Shell + Niri, and it just kinda didn't work in some ways like theming, but Wayland worked great.
Also performance with multi-displays is kinda poor, or at least it was when I tried it.
But Niri? Perfect
Absolutely FLAWLESS Wayland. EVERYTHING works
And now that I have DMS there's so much done for me. It's really a great system
Since I love the scrolling aspect of Niri as well, it works out well that it has the best Wayland support. 10/10 project. I love it
When I was on X11 still I was primarily an i3 user, and the transition to Hyprland and Niri has been generally positive
But yeah, I've worked with Nvidia on Linux for several years now on multiple machines. I'm finally throwing in the towel whenever I buy a new PC. AMD all the way. It's just better on Linux, even on X11
I'd recommend using something like Niri instead of mutter for the compositor as Niri is:
Extremely customizable
Meant to be used alone (unlike mutter which is for Gnome)
Supportive of Wayland portals better than any compositor I've tried
Very modern
Pretty stable
Making use of scrolling window management which is, imo, superior to anything else
You could force all windows to be floating if you want that traditional method tho
I'd also recommend using DankMaterialShell and simply providing a theming to get the appeal you want. It works well with Niri and provides all the system tools you need for an OS like bluetooth and audio management, application lookup, etc. It's sort of a stripped down Gnome-shell for standalone compositors but way more customizable.
Then everything else can just be installed WINE apps.
I like Ardour. It's got everything you need. It's what I've been using for the past couple years now. It even supports VST2/VST3 plugins through WINE
I also recommend using yabridge to set up Windows plugins to work on Linux, but be warned there is risk of compatibility issues with plugins on Linux when buying new ones!
Typically use the built in LPF/HPF, Graph Eq, Reverb, and Compressor plugins. They work great
Wait a little while and low key Audacity 4 might release a fully capable DAW as well now that it's adding better clip support, plugin support, non-destructive editing for some effects like compression, reverb, etc. Of course, it will be mainly for if you do a lot of recording. For electronic, Ardour would probably be better even after Audacity 4 releases.
As others said, it means nullable, but to put it in more intuitive, less-jargony way - it's a question mark bc you don't know if the value is actually there or not. It could be a Singleton, but it isn't until you check if there is a value. Whereas if you have, idk, int a no question mark, then you're saying you actually have data.
Essentially with C# 8, they "removed" null and reused the idea of null references in creating what is essentially an Option like in other languages. You either have some data of some type, or none (a null reference, in this case). By default, everything has to be there. Then when you need null, e.g. you may not have something initialized or an operation could fail, you explicitly grab for it. Thus it reduces null pointer bugs. If you don't need nullability, you can ensure that you don't accidentally write in an issue. It safety checks statements and parameters.
Yeah it was good for a while. But now a few important websites for me just don't work anymore, like a page for paying my loan. It only worked in chromium browsers. I know that chromium will work everywhere because they're the first to implement the newest standards and are the most supported by developers due to it having a huge market share. I can't rely on knowing firefox will work anymore. I've lost faith in it as a product.
Yes they are. They are agreed upon standards set for future development from a host of different companies. Chrome is just always the first to implement them. It's not that firefox will never have them, they just develop slow.
And I won't switch from brave bc it's the one browser that just works and has good adblock
One of the few chromies that has adblock still as well as decent privacy-by-default settings. I just disable the AI stuff. It doesn't have crypto stuff anymore (at least not in your face; I'm sure you can still re-enable it). It's the best chromium browser by far.
Nope.
I've thought about this before, and it gave me an interesting thought process: AI can't ever be good at doing a large project.
It has a hard limit. Not only is it not as good as us, the best it can ever do is as good as us, and we're not even good at it. That's all it can be trained on! Our garbage code lol