Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)K

Khanzarate

@ Khanzarate @lemmy.world

Posts
1
Comments
339
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Geologists doubt Earth has the amount of copper needed to develop the entire world

    Jump

  • Oh dang time flies when you're having fun exploiting people

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • That's a ferret.

  • Tis the way

    Jump

  • You're missing how a bunch of their friends from their new social class already do drugs and how good those drugs feel.

    Easy hole to fall into, but money honestly makes it harder to climb out of, you can always afford the drugs.

    So it becomes the norm, whereas someone at the poverty line with an addiction can't afford them regularly and has to spend grocery money on them and therefore might be addicted but also resents them.

    Rich people can afford to normalize drugs and consider themselves fine while they're on them, because they're still living within their means.

  • Sad fact of life

    Jump

  • Old, near the top, but it still flows down. Dunno exact age. Blonde, but not everyone loses hair color.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • The difference is, if this were to happen and it was found later that a court case crucial to the defense were used, that's a mistrial. Maybe even dismissed with prejudice.

    Courts are bullshit sometimes, it's true, but it would take deliberate judge/lawyer collusion for this to occur, or the incompetence of the judge and the opposing lawyer.

    Is that possible? Sure. But the question was "will fictional LLM case law enter the general knowledge?" and my answer is "in a functioning court, no."

    If the judge and a lawyer are colluding or if a judge and the opposing lawyer are both so grossly incompetent, then we are far beyond an improper LLM citation.

    TL;DR As a general rule, you have to prove facts in court. When that stops being true, liars win, no AI needed.

  • Instead of takedown ads, this Gen-Z congressional candidate is using campaign money to feed people

    Jump

  • Once you're in place and have access to tax dollars instead of campaign funds, you get them spent on things by putting that community infrastructure into place.

    One problem with that is they're running for a collective position. In their campaign, they're captain of their own ship. A congresswoman is more a crewmate. Greater power, but more divided.

    One thing they would be able to do, though, is never stop campaigning. They'll be less active, as a congresswoman, but the campaign pivots to next election (which, let's be honest, that's already the norm, there is no break from politics anymore), and that next election can be focused on on-the-ground community campaigning the entire time.

    So, no, you won't see the same level of activism with tax dollars, they don't lead, but she and others that follow her can do good consistently with their position through campaign funds and fight for good in their government while that happens.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Right the internet that's increasingly full of AI material.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Nah that means you can ask an LLM "is this real" and get a correct answer.

    That defeats the point of a bunch of kinds of material.

    Deepfakes, for instance. International espionage, propaganda, companies who want "real people".

    A simple is_ai checkbox of any kind is undesirable, but those sources will end back up in every LLM, even one that was behaving and flagging its output.

    You'd need every LLM to do this, and there's open source models, there's foreign ones. And as has already been proven, you can't rely on an LLM detecting a generated product without it.

    The correct way to do it would be to instead organize a not-ai certification for real content. But that would severely limit training data. It could happen once quantity of data isn't the be-all end-all for a model, but I dunno when when or if that'll be the case.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • No, because there's still no case.

    Law textbooks that taught an imaginary case would just get a lot of lawyers in trouble, because someone eventually will wanna read the whole case and will try to pull the actual case, not just a reference. Those cases aren't susceptible to this because they're essentially a historical record. It's like the difference between a scan of the declaration of independence and a high school history book describing it. Only one of those things could be bullshitted by an LLM.

    Also applies to law schools. People do reference back to cases all the time, there's an opposing lawyer, after all, who'd love a slam dunk win of "your honor, my opponent is actually full of shit and making everything up". Any lawyer trained on imaginary material as if it were reality will just fail repeatedly.

    LLMs can deceive lawyers who don't verify their work. Lawyers are in fact required to verify their work, and the ones that have been caught using LLMs are quite literally not doing their job. If that wasn't the case, lawyers would make up cases themselves, they don't need an LLM for that, but it doesn't happen because it doesn't work.

  • FCC commissioner writes op-ed titled, “It’s time for Trump to DOGE the FCC“

    Jump

  • Yes that's what he's saying.

  • Anyone else hating Shorts (the videos, not the pants or financial instruments)?

    Jump

  • I feel you. I used to be the same. I got used to audiobooks in the same way, but only because I had to, when I had my kid, and I couldn't spare the hands to read. I could, however, get some sport headphones, bone-conducting, so I could hear the baby if she cried but could hear my book without disturbing her, and once I was used to that, that became my preferred way to read.

    Maybe that made me more adaptable.

    Either way, if you don't need to adapt, there's no harm in not adapting. Live your life, you'll adapt when/if you need to.

  • Diese Gemeinde ist nun Teil der Bundesrepublik Deutschland oder so

    Jump

  • Its no problem, just learn German by translating the memes.

  • Anyone else hating Shorts (the videos, not the pants or financial instruments)?

    Jump

  • I used to feel that way, they didn't have the depth I wanted.

    My wife has sent me so many tiktoks that I got used to it.

    Now I still don't watch them, but because I'd get stuck in them. Whatever my wife sends, and specific ones from content people I know make quality, and that's about it. Once you get past them being presented in a new way, they're more addicting to ADHD brains.

    I will say that if you were gonna pick your minute long vertical video platform, tiktok is the best one, YouTube the worst, but Facebook and Instagram are a lot closer to YouTube shorts than tiktoks. I'm reasonably confident it's because YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram see it as a way to extend your stay on a platform with other content, while tiktok focuses on it exclusively. Their algorithms are doing different things.

  • weird priorities

    Jump

  • I mean, the people in charge of Nintendo now aren't those people.

    In 50 years, if Microsoft had gone co-op, withdrawn from genocide, removed telemetry, and like half a dozen other things, due to a change in leadership, I'd also not hold that future Microsoft as at fault for current Microsoft.

    I also don't hold Volkswagen responsible for the Holocaust, presently. Just the emissions fraud (and maybe more that I can't currently recall).

  • weird priorities

    Jump

  • See but I've never heard Nintendo supporting genocide actively.

    Like, yes, they're a corporation, they love money, they do stupid things to get money, but they're not doing nearly the same shit as other companies I hate.

    Or if they are, I haven't heard of it, it's all been game key cards.

    The game key card thing feels like a clinton-blowjob level scandal while some other people are doing a whole genocide.

    Am I missing something?

  • Tesla bait-and-switch: Cybertruck owners won't get Autosteer feature they paid for

    Jump

  • Nah thats the government's ability to regulate.

    He hasn't defunded the courts, so private lawsuits can occur. (At least he hasn't as of today, maybe he will tomorrow)

  • Tesla bait-and-switch: Cybertruck owners won't get Autosteer feature they paid for

    Jump

  • But also may they sue for false advertising and cost Tesla legal fees and result in them being obligated to provide these services for free.

  • End of 10 - Windows ten is ending. Microsoft wants you to buy a new computer. But what if you could make your current one fast and secure again?

    Jump

  • Yeah that too.

    I'm happy with mint I just wanted to see what it said.

  • End of 10 - Windows ten is ending. Microsoft wants you to buy a new computer. But what if you could make your current one fast and secure again?

    Jump

  • I'd never heard of it so I tried it out, it seemed fine until the end where it listed about ten different distros with no real way to differentiate them.

    Like, yeah, mint and Ubuntu and elementary and zorin and xubuntu all work for my use cases. I wanted it to give me a reason why one is better than another.

    So, yeah, can't recommend that website. It's trying to help, but it won't, really.