Well legally, because that agreement simply declared the new situation. There’s no exit clause, it’s just how things are now.
Morally, nothing. Fuck the federal government. We technically deleted the first, the articles of confederation, we can delete this one.
Plot twist: one guy brought in 3 locked milks.
First thing it did was overwrite the partition table and everything else with that, to make its own, since it could disregard all the existing data.
I agree with the other commenter, commercial recovery, if the data was that crucial.
*hippochrissy
That relationship is why in every edition but fifth, healing is necromancy, and why Heal and Harm are identical in 3rd/pf, because they’re the same fundamentally, you just had to tweak the settings on one to get the other.
Its for prescription drugs.
You’re not supposed to flush them or throw them away without taking precautions to make sure they don’t end up in nature. Pill bottles aren’t water tight and all.
Rather than see people flush them or whatever, pharmacies will often take them and they have these days as an awareness thing.
Pretty sure the police do it just because they get drugs from arrests and already have what they need to do it properly.
A lot of our neurons are with us for our whole life. Early neuron degeneration is what causes Alzheimer’s, Parkinsons, and similar disorders.
Not all neurons last a lifetime, and there are kinds that die off and are replaced, but a good chunk of them aren’t meant to replicate anymore and so won’t be freed of microplastics by bloodletting, and would cause serious problems if microplastics harm their normal processes.
Regular cells die or split regularly. When they die, white blood cells eat them, and they’ll be part of filtering the blood.
Neurons don’t though. There’s still some concerns.
Oh that’s unfortunate. Well I don’t mind not supporting people like that so I’ll give it a go
Do you mean play disco Elysium or is there some drama associated with it?
Well the IRS says it is accurate.
It doesn’t say accurate to what standard but I think its pretty clear that “tax law” is the default here.
Still feels like a waste. But my spool was just taking up space.
I regret it, it was dozens of disks, and yet haven’t needed a CD since.
Although I do still use DVDs on occasion.
Sounds awesome. You got yourself a little spy.
Oh dang time flies when you’re having fun exploiting people
That’s a ferret.
You’re missing how a bunch of their friends from their new social class already do drugs and how good those drugs feel.
Easy hole to fall into, but money honestly makes it harder to climb out of, you can always afford the drugs.
So it becomes the norm, whereas someone at the poverty line with an addiction can’t afford them regularly and has to spend grocery money on them and therefore might be addicted but also resents them.
Rich people can afford to normalize drugs and consider themselves fine while they’re on them, because they’re still living within their means.
Old, near the top, but it still flows down. Dunno exact age. Blonde, but not everyone loses hair color.
The difference is, if this were to happen and it was found later that a court case crucial to the defense were used, that’s a mistrial. Maybe even dismissed with prejudice.
Courts are bullshit sometimes, it’s true, but it would take deliberate judge/lawyer collusion for this to occur, or the incompetence of the judge and the opposing lawyer.
Is that possible? Sure. But the question was “will fictional LLM case law enter the general knowledge?” and my answer is “in a functioning court, no.”
If the judge and a lawyer are colluding or if a judge and the opposing lawyer are both so grossly incompetent, then we are far beyond an improper LLM citation.
TL;DR As a general rule, you have to prove facts in court. When that stops being true, liars win, no AI needed.
The CEOs discussed it and this year the limit is “at least one more”