Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)K

Khanzarate

@ Khanzarate @lemmy.world

Posts
1
Comments
342
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • ProtonMail provides information used to identify email owner...

    Jump

  • You do realize that you don't get time, generally speaking, to delete things, when a government legally demands your info, right?

    As soon as any company sees a lawful order demanding information, deleting it becomes a crime.

    If this same thing happened to mailbox.org, you heard about it immediately, and hit all the delete buttons you can find, mailbox.org will still hand over your info to them, as they're legally obligated to do so. It's not a gdpr violation or anything like that.

  • [Serious] Can a fire atronach, a elemental bound by magic to you, give consent?

    Jump

  • They are bound and cannot make decisions in that way.

    The proof is in the conjuration master quest.

    You can summon dremora, creatures definitely capable of speaking, consenting, etc, via "Conjure Dremora Lord" and they have no dialogue, cannot be ordered, and do not act as a follower in skyrim would, even an unwilling one. But, at conjuration 90, in the College, you can get a spell, "Conjure Unbound Dremora", which summons a Dremora that is hostile, can speak, and can change its mind if you threaten it with violence. That dremora, once unsummoned, can then willingly (under duress) go get you a sigil stone, and carries it back with him.

    Clearly, there's a distinction here, the unbound version of the spell had no compulsion effect on it. This would be needed since after dismissing the spell, the compulsion ends, so they wouldn't obey.

    Logically, if we can make a "Summon Unbound Dremora", we could make a "Summon Unbound Flame Atronach", and that spell would repeatedly summon the same atronach with no compulsion, but the standard version of these spells summons things in a way that prevents consent.

  • ard

    Jump

  • The root means "slow", BTW, so it does get to join that list.

  • Ars Technica Fires Reporter After AI Controversy Involving Fabricated Quotes

    Jump

  • A few years ago, blatant journalistic malpractice was a controversy.

  • Ars Technica Fires Reporter After AI Controversy Involving Fabricated Quotes

    Jump

  • Are people so lazy they can't even bother to read the headline? Maybe an AI would've been useful here to generate its own defense.

  • Disgraced Andrew insists royal staff call him 'sir' and fetch beer

    Jump

  • Seems a little threadbare as a theory.

    People have been adding other people to royal families for the entirety of recorded history.

    Sometimes its through marriage, but sometimes its adoption, sometimes they just make up a lineage.

    Now, theres arguments against royalty, for sure, but if the royal family wasn't allowed to prune itself, find the best people and merge them into the royal family, etc, there never would've been royals in the first place. Royal families begin with individuals but they remain by caring about "good breeding" (and other ways of consolidating power).

    Consolidating is the real purpose. It can be obscured with religious lines of divinity, or what have you, but royal families are always shopping for people to incorporate.

  • Canadian man in ICE custody says he thought agents were only focusing on ‘criminals and murderers’

    Jump

  • While they did manage to find something to check off the right forms as "is criminal", those were years ago, and had no reason to do anything about it now, and no reason to suspect he would reoffend, given the nature of the crimes.

    So no, they're in the wrong.

  • TIL You can leagally drop your baby off at the fire station in all 50 states

    Jump

  • Nah they're made aware.

    I mean, I guess a state could've passed the law, saying "hey, leave newborns at fire stations" and not informed the fire house, but it seems far more likely that they are informed.

    But States either have designated boxes, or you hand the child over to them directly. You don't just leave it in front of the firehouse door.

  • An Alberta man wanted MAID. Instead, he died in a Catholic hospital, waiting to be transferred

    Jump

  • So, in Quebec, according to this article, they passed a law requiring facilities to let it happen on-site.

    That's all that needs to happen, a hospital has any specific equipment on hand, and be willing to let in a doctor who is OK with it.

    I agree with you, that no individual person should be forced to kill someone, but a hospital isn't a person and doesn't have feelings. There's a very reasonable chance someone works there who would have been OK with providing MAID, but doesn't, and even if 100% of the doctors there weren't OK with it, it's a lot simpler to have a doctor travel than it is to arrange a whole new bed, ambulance, on-site doctor, and family.

    To me at least, that IS negligence. It's not a violation of any individual's beliefs that MAID happens in their general vicinity, and it's just not true that requiring a facility to allow it results in requiring individuals to perform it.

    Also, less relevant, it's not necessarily that the vehicle can't keep the patient alive, it's just that there is a chance of the patient passing at any time, and that time might be during transport in an ambulance that is designed for emergencies first and doesn't accommodate families.

  • Is it possible to pay someone to create an excel sheet for me?

    Jump

  • The answer is yes, this is exactly what sites like fiverr are for.

    That is, if you value your time more than your money for this, because there's probably a way to still semi-automate it and avoid some of the work. But yes, fiverr.

  • Gemini lies to user about health info, says it wanted to make him feel better

    Jump

  • I think humanizing them is a fairly trivial thing, in this sort of context.

    Yes, it's true, it didn't "lie" about health.

    But it has the same result as someone lying, it's another bulletpoint in the list of reasons not to trust AI, even if it pulls from the right sources and presents information generally correctly, it may in fact just not present information it could have presented because the sources it learned from have done so in a way that would get those sources deemed "liars".

    Could write that out every time, I suppose, but people will say their dog is trying to trick them when he goes to the bowl 5 minutes after dinner, or goes to their partner for the same, and everyone understands the dog isn't actually attempting to deceive them, and just wants more.

    Same thing, to me at least. It lied, but in a similar way to how my dog lies, not in the way a human can lie.

  • Western Digital Has No More HDD Capacity Left, as CEO Reveals Massive AI Deals; Brace Yourself For Price Surges Ahead!

    Jump

  • No, they're definitely also expanding.

    Not all of them, certainly, but there are a few plans for new factories. Samsung, for instance, is rolling out a new chip factory, if you want something to search.

  • Zero lies or exaggerations detected.

    Jump

  • On Wikipedia, I see 19 (16 murders and 3 things associated with the murders).

    Trump has 34 last I checked.

  • Dr. Oz begs Americans to take the measles vaccine as infections soar

    Jump

  • I'm sorry, I more meant anything supporting he did that, specifically.

    I'm finding articles about how X thing he did isn't fully legitimate because it doesn't have the research, he peddled it anyway, or how X thing he claimed was completely baseless, but nothing indicating he ever stole authorship or paid off some group to falsely be listed as an author.

  • Dr. Oz begs Americans to take the measles vaccine as infections soar

    Jump

  • You got a source for that, by chance?

  • Dr. Oz begs Americans to take the measles vaccine as infections soar

    Jump

  • Nah that's Dr. Phil.

    Dr. Oz is a medical doctor and actually has contributed to medical science in a significant way, too. He's done at least one successful heart transplant that I know about and helped make the LVAD.

    Comparing him to Dr. Phil, though, all we really learn is that real and fake doctors can peddle bullshit and misinformation on TV.

  • Drug dealers hate this one weird trick!

    Jump

  • Simple, dissolve the whole package in one gallon of water, and then the solution is 110 times as potent as it should be.

    Round up to 128 because watering it down a little more won't hurt you, and that simplifies the math. You put one ounce of that gallon of solution into a second gallon of water, and you're ready to drink. Repeat with a new gallon of tap water mixed with an ounce of your solution as needed.

  • UK House of Lords Votes to Extend Age Verification to VPNs

    Jump

  • It usually does, but it doesn't have to.

  • Why do servers and supercomputers primarily run on Linux and not on some Microsoft/Apple/Google/Amazon OS?

    Jump

  • They could, if they wanted to. This is somewhat an example of "if it isn't broken, don't fix it".

    A lot of that is the fact that Linux is run incredibly lean. Replicating that isn't cheap. They absolutely can, but since Linux is free and they can even modify it to suit their needs, its far simpler to do that.

    Android is the best example. Google wanted a phone OS, so they bought Android Inc, who was making one. They could've spun up their own with their own talent, hired more, etc, but just absorbed one instead. That talent was making a phone OS based on Linux, because, again, they could've delved into the details of OS creation, but it was far easier to take a free OS, change the bits you want changed (like adding touchscreen support, which to my knowledge, wasn't in the Linux version Android started with), and run with the new version you've made.

    It's also worth pointing out that Google has spent a lot of money on Android, and other large companies spend a lot on developing their own custom Linux Distro. It's not like they have one software engineer for Android who downloaded Linux once and changed it. These companies are willing to do what you describe, they just didn't have to reinvent the wheel. The Linux kernel, thanks to the community behind it, is incredibly secure and efficient, and there just wasn't any reason to change it or copy it when it exists and is free to use.

  • cats @lemmy.world
    Khanzarate @lemmy.world

    Peter is wondering about all the ruckus lately.