I don't know who might want this, but as I wrote in another comment I suspect their real goal is to somehow train “AI” to move in the real world with obstacles on customers hardware for future use for robots or maybe something like that.
I suspect their real goal is to somehow train "AI" to move in the real world with obstacles on customers hardware for future use for robots in the real world.
I have old Thinkpad 230 with Coreboot. From the user's point of view, when using the Linux distributions, I don't feel any difference between Coreboot and a regular BIOS. Coreboot or Libreboot installation can sometimes be difficult, you may need a separate hardware programmer and it can be difficult to connect the wires to the contacts.
It would be good if, when people use technical devices, they didn't just rely on them, but tried to understand or study how it all works. And schoolchildren would also be taught how it all works, at least within the limits of what is possible for them, and not just click on the buttons and get the result. And completely replacing writing with a pen with typing on a keyboard is also not always good.
Yes, I probably simplified everything too much. And someone may like to code and use "AI" to explore or learn some other unfamiliar aspects. Or, for example, someone may love the very result of creating some programs, rather than the coding process. But in a way, I just meant that if a person likes to code, invent architecture, and is interested in how everything works from the inside, then he won't be so interested if "AI" writes all the code for him. For example, I feel more satisfied when I write the code myself. Although in quite rare cases, I can ask a local LLM question for learning when I don't know something.
Although I may be slightly mistaken, I seem to have found that there are now some exceptions to financial payments for patent violations in relation to unfriendly countries.
Although I may be slightly mistaken, I seem to have found that there are some exceptions to financial payments for patent violations in relation to unfriendly countries.
It’s not officially legalized somehow. It’s just not strictly enforced right now. They mostly don’t pay attention. But sometimes there's more chance of paying attention if it's Russian Intellectual Property. I think that if the copyright holder complains about specific content with specific links, they will delete it especially if he is from friendly countries.
They are still on sale and very cheap in price, but the RAM for them has already gone up in price. Yes it was very good deal for it's money, I have one. Usually I prefer something Coreboot capable, but thats just was very cheap.
I'm from Russia, so I don't need to boycott American corporations myself, American corporations boycott me themselves. :DIt's a joke.
But in reality, I just try to minimize my purchases from multi-billion dollar corporations whenever possible. I prefer buying indie, open-source or custom. Nothing about culture. As others have already said, nowadays American culture is mostly common culture. Sometimes I think about buying a Chinese CPU or GPU. And in general, I have a pretty limited budget.
I don't know who might want this, but as I wrote in another comment I suspect their real goal is to somehow train “AI” to move in the real world with obstacles on customers hardware for future use for robots or maybe something like that.