One thing I always wonder is if it actually could end poverty 22 times over.
i mean, rich people hoarding money is increasing moneys scarcity for everyone else, theoretically increasing its value. And if it were suddenly distibuted fairly, it'd lose value and there would be a higher cut off for what's considered poverty. on the other hand, a lot of their money is funny money, like being tied up in stocks and not actually worth as much in currency compared to what is said (if they sold the stock, the value would drop and they'd get less).
so i'm actually curious if anyone ever did an analysis of what would happen if e.g. the wealth of the top 0.1% is evenly spread across the population.
of course that's super complex and hard to say what the social effects would be. But the simplistic 'everyone would get x dollars, poverty limit is y, x > y, so no more poverty', while useful to show the scale, always sounded too naive to me.
In general, anything that hijacks search shortcuts.
Oh you wanted to search for text on this one page? Let me show you a search bar for the whole website instead, with a search that's strictly worse than the search engine that you came from in the first place.
Machining is super expensive as a hobby to get started.
Which is why I'm slowly upgrading my cheap CNC router to be more rigid and capable, bit by bit. Machined stainles for the first time last week. though i'll never get close to a 'real' machine, in hobby machining, everything is a finishing pass…
This can work, but with cryptography instead of the porn site connecting to a government service.
The swiss government wanted to introduce electronic id a few years back which was a complete clusterfuck, every party would get all your private data even if they just needed 'older than 18', it was supposed to be implemented by various private companies that then sell it to the individual states, not really with gov oversight, so you have like 20 companies all with all the data, each of which could be hacked at any point etc.
we forced a public vote on it in 2021 and rejected it with 65%.
the use cases are pretty valid, like online pharmacies, ordering booze online, though of course you never know what they would require it for in the future.
so now it's 2025 and a new proposal, this time much more privacy focused, developed by the government, open source, seems like they did listen to a lot of the criticism.
this blogpost goes into a bit of details on why unlinkability matters and that one-time-pads are one potential solution. And the whitepaper with more detail.
i saw a presentation from the digital society on it earlier this year and from what i remember, you get a set of keys (and can create new ones if you run out) from which you can create derived keys that only contain relevant information. The other party can verify this directly, without a gov service. And since you use a new key each time, the porn site also cant crossreference with your booze site that you're the same person, that kind of stuff. It all sounded pretty reasonable and like it would adress your points.
Ist natürlich auch blöd, wenn dann die hauptsächlich aus Rentnern bestehende Gemeindeversammlung entscheidet, den Steuerfuss zu senken und gleichzeitig an der gleichen Versammlung Millionen für Rollstuhlgerechte Fahrstühle ausgibt, wie hier vor ein paar Monaten.
Also die Fahrstühle sind ne gute Sache aber dann noch Steuerfuss senken, sich gegen bezahlbare Wohnungen aussprechen (man hat ja sein Haus) und bei Schulen Container oder die billigste Offerte für hässliche Betonklotzschulen ohne richtigen Pausenplatz annehmen usw.
Wär natürlich nett, wenn mehr jüngere Leute an der Gemeindeversammlung wären, aber Dienstags von 19-23Uhr Zeit machen mit Job und Kindern ist deutlich schwieriger als als Rentner.
I'm super happy with my formbot Marathon IDEX, works perfectly fine with TPU (though i did have to adjust one screw guide in the extruder so it doesn't eat the filament).
it's not very well known, since they don't hand them out to influencers etc. The discord is pretty active and lots of helpful people there.
made with all standard components, regular Klipper firmware, so i know i can replace parts if anything ever breaks.
And IDEX in mirror/copy mode for printing multiple parts at twice the speed is great when you need it.
I wonder a bit in how far the opposite is the plan.
Like Klarna recently firing support staff for AI and then wanting to hire them back, but as gig workers.
A company laying off thousands of engineers wont be nice for the stock. Saying you're doing it because you'll replace them with awesome AI might even pump the stock and is an easy excuse.
if you can the hire them back cheaper later because the job market is shit because many devs lost their job, even better.
It just reminds of this case from the 30s where a factory owner replaced skilled workers that wanted to unionize with machines and unskilled workers. The quality was worse and they produced less in a given time, and the machines were scrapped 3 years later. But it stopped unionization dead in its tracks and skilled workers got lower salaries afterward, so it all worked out even though the machines were strictly worse.
sort of. Having a system that allows multiple parties, like in many European countries, certainly helps with representation and discourse. But looking at Europe, it certainly doesn't prevent a right-wing drift towards authoritarianism. There's sooo many other things needed for a healthy democracy, like education/literacy, strong independent institutions, unions etc.
You can just end up with two right wing parties, an extreme and a moderate one, but the moderate one catering to the extreme positions of the extreme party (and being mostly moderate in name only), and both of them forming a majority government and drifting to authoritarianism, even if there are many parties.
A proper (CNC) milling machine and lathe, like ones you can work hardened steel with. Lots of better things you could buy for that money, but with a mill and lathe i could make those things for even more money!
Edit: oh and a proper garage/hobby room to put them in
Actually, as to your edit, the it sounds like you're fine-tuning the model for your data, not training it from scratch. So the llm has seen english and chinese before during the initial training. Also, they represent words as vectors and what usually happens is that similiar words' vectors are close together. So subtituting e.g. Dad for Papa looks almost the same to an llm. Same across languages. But that's not understanding, that's behavior that way simpler models also have.
thanks that really solved my problem, you're amazing!
I still have mixed feelings about deleting one's whole comment history, though i also did that when I left reddit. it's the right thing to do, but the amount of information lost because of greedy leadership is super sad.
Techies interested in privacy and fairness is just another target/focus group to be marketed to..
But even given that every company sucks(eventually) and every ceo is an asshole. there's something to be said about about spreading out and e.g. using proton over gmail and other google services.they might both suck, but at least if it's spread out, there's not one asshole ceo that controls all our stuff at once. You can't vote with your wallet, but preventing monopolies (the natural end game of a free market) by supporting smaller alternatives can still be worthwile. Not that it solves the underlying issues, but i think it can at least slow the decay a bit.
Maybe email is a better comparison for federated stuff than phpbb? You wouldn't tell someone to 'just get an email adress'. You'd recommend a specific email provider.
One thing I always wonder is if it actually could end poverty 22 times over.
i mean, rich people hoarding money is increasing moneys scarcity for everyone else, theoretically increasing its value. And if it were suddenly distibuted fairly, it'd lose value and there would be a higher cut off for what's considered poverty. on the other hand, a lot of their money is funny money, like being tied up in stocks and not actually worth as much in currency compared to what is said (if they sold the stock, the value would drop and they'd get less).
so i'm actually curious if anyone ever did an analysis of what would happen if e.g. the wealth of the top 0.1% is evenly spread across the population.
of course that's super complex and hard to say what the social effects would be. But the simplistic 'everyone would get x dollars, poverty limit is y, x > y, so no more poverty', while useful to show the scale, always sounded too naive to me.