I write that in my first sentence : “I dislike this article because it hides important facts until the last section”

You also make it sound like I’m defending MS - that confuse me quite a bit too since I’m actually stating in my comment that they did something shitty.

Clear now?

You disagree with what? Do you think it is great journalism to hide that information to the very end of the article?

MS clearly did something shitty, not arguing about that.

Agreed, but not my argument.

It’s very unprofessional by MS and they should be shamed for it, I’m not arguing against that. I’m only saying I think this article is bad.

I dislike this article because it hides important facts until the last section: “I am in touch with Microsoft about OneDrive Photos, and my early findings suggest that it was an unintended rollout. An apology should be coming soon.”

So, this journalist/news site shames Microsoft for doing something shitty, while doing something shitty themselves.

Tak admin! Har smidt 100kr i puljen :)

“Aside from the obvious fact that Canada’s only physical border with the EU is the 1.2 kilometre one on Greenland’s tiny Hans Island in the Nares Strait, Canada maintains an open trade regime and could, from a technical standpoint, transition relatively smoothly into the EU’s tariff-free internal market.”

Technically, Greenland is actually not a full member of the EU: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenland_and_the_European_Union

I think this is the regulation: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1804/oj/eng

Yes if course, not required retroactively, but as you, I think some will simply update all their stations anyway, simply so their customers know they will always be able to pay with a credit card at their stations.

I believe EU regulations say that at least fast charging stations is required to have credit card payment option

I don’t quite follow your thought?

According to the page, this is the data that is stored on the chip:

=== CUT === In addition, this memory chip collects a limited set of information about the usage of the product, which might include the following: The date when the toner cartridge was first installed The date when the toner cartridge was last used The number of pages printed using the toner cartridge Page coverage Printing modes used Any printing errors that might have occurred The product model === CUT ===

I don’t like that they collect this info, but I don’t see any really scary information mentioned there?

Whether I trust HP that is all they store and recover is an entirely other matter ;)

As I wrote, they are going in the wrong direction 😕

Then i guess we agree, my comment was about ads, not all kinds of other stuff.

I rarely use the app store either, but it amazes me that Apple thinks that is just fine…

Og hvor går grænsen så? Google er blot blevet værre og værre. Synes altid det ender med at reklamerne overtager mere og mere. Dertil vil de have en grund til at overvåge brugerne for at skabe mere værdi til salg af reklamepladserne. I sidste ende er det pengene der bestemmer. Kagi har modsat ingen grund til at overvåge brugerne - det vil bare være en ekstra udgift. For dem er det økonomisk optimalt levere det bedste søgeresultat. Jo færre søgninger en bruger laver, jo mere tjener de (hver søgning koster dem penge).

As I wrote in my other comment: I have seen ads in settings, they recently put an ad for their F1 movie in the wallet app and don’t get me started on the App store.

Depends on what you define as the OS. They put ads for their F1 movie in the Wallet app recently. I’ve seen ads for their services in the settings menu.

Apple has generally not had ads anywhere. However in recent years they are placing ads in more and more locations, making the user experience worse. Do you disagree with that statement?

Apple was the safe haven, but they too are going that route…