Fantastic news.
Fantastic news.
Anti-Hamas rage bait. Article ACTUALLY says “there are “reasonable grounds” to believe that Hamas committed rape and “sexualised torture” during its attack in southern Israel on 7 October.”
From OCTOBER.
Israel murdered over a hundred people LAST WEEK who were starving and waiting in line for food and injured around 750 more, so why are we seeing an influx of articles making ‘reasonable assumptions’ against Hamas from 5 months ago? It still doesn’t justify Israel’s actions.
lmao, no.
It was specifically written after the civil war so that the South could still technically have slavery, they just have to criminalize and convict a person first. It’s how we get the ‘war on drugs’ where even though black and white populations smoke around the same amount, black populations were criminalized FAR harsher, and sent to prison far more often. It’s exactly “Rules for thee, but not for me” on a grand scale where white people would likely ‘get a pass’ for their first arrest. That grace was not extended to black populations, and so we’re back at having slavery with extra steps.
It’s a nice thought that it just happened over time by accident, but in reality it was planned like this.
Jesus Fucking Christ, pick a side, article:
Average age of shooter was 16
“It’s not really about gun ownership”
More than half of the shooters got the firearm they used from a family member or a relative. About 30% got a weapon from the illegal market, while 22% obtained weapons from friends or acquaintances.
So 70% got it through someone who legally owned the gun already, and 30% bought it illegally. A 16 year old cannot purchase a gun legally.
SURE SEEMS LIKE PEOPLE OWNING A GUN IS A FACTOR, THEN, HUH
Never thought I would see the day where Google crumbles, but they’re actively sprinting towards it now.