Are the ads in the room with us right now?
Edit: I thought it was obvious that this was a joke, my mistake.
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/is-x-in-the-room-with-us-right-now
Are the ads in the room with us right now?
Edit: I thought it was obvious that this was a joke, my mistake.
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/is-x-in-the-room-with-us-right-now
it was just one group of rich greedy people turning on another group of rich greedy people. Nothing to get excited about.
Sounds better than what we currently have:
Groups of poor desperate people turning on other groups of poor desperate people.
If you’re wanting to practice soldering, and build a small, cheap project at the same time, I’d recommend cheap project kits from Aliexpress (there are probably equivalents on Amazon). Do projects that are through hole soldering first, before attempting SMD components.
There are plenty to choose from and they’re cheap, so if it doesn’t work then it doesn’t matter much.
There will be plenty of Youtube videos of people putting these things together if you want to know more.
Have fun!
I understand where you’re coming from: If natural dialogue is preferred for a creative work, then having laughter audio is inappropriate.
I disagree that canned laughter and live audience laughter are equivalent.
With live audience reactions it’s like watching a theatre presentation, you get to be part of the crowd. We get a chance to laugh at the jokes at a natural pace (allowing for pauses so we don’t miss the next joke) that the audience would set, and their reactions are modulated organically.
Canned laughter doesn’t do this, it doesn’t set a natural pace. It is calculated by an audio engineer, and the laughter will be an unnatural reaction to the joke presented.
It’s the difference between a genuine and forced smile. We can naturally sense something is off. A live audience reaction is superior to canned laughter in most cases.
That being said, some shows don’t need laughter audio to be enjoyable.
The IT Crowd didn’t use canned laugh tracks, They recorded audio of audience responses.
They pay out of initial capital investment and leveraging.
How does pirating make a corporation broke? Making a copy doesn’t steal money.
Edit: We can’t pirate a company into bankruptcy.
Up and down votes are not a “agree / disagree” button. They are for dis/encouraging posts. You can upvote a post you disagree with but can see that it is useful for the discussion.
Removed by mod
The most likely scenario is that the person with first-hand knowledge misinterpreted the situation.
Exactly. Which is why I started with questions so you could explain more. That’s how a conversation works and prevents it from getting toxic.
These poor men and their sensitive feelings…
Case and point.
What year is it? This has been true for over a decade.
Removed by mod
“Depeche mode”?
OOTL: Oh, it’s a band.
I heard if you say “Tux” three times while staring into a mirror your daily driver turns up dual booted.
Unfortunately that is how the human body works. Our sleep/wake cycle can only naturally drift by about an hour a day. It isn’t entirely dependent on how you feel.
Oh, I thought spacecrafts were wombs. It has to provide all necessary elements to sustain life. The astronauts even have “umbilical cords” attached to their spacesuits.
and you’re not hurting anyone else in doing so
Evaluating this condition across all levels of your community is almost impossible, from the individual level up to a global level. It can also be evaluated across time. The total sum effects of actions (and inactions) are incalculable.
“All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.”
Wake me up when the fines overshadow the profits.
Using Twitter was the mistake.
You’re using the New York Times to support the idea that the New York Times didn’t support the war.
What do you think could be an issue with using that evidence?
Edit: I find it amusing that the article you shared is partially blocked (censored) unless I sign up to the NYT.
These sources show that the New York Times supported the war because it poorly reported the idea that Iraq had WMDs. The NYT did not do its due dilligence, intentionally mislead the public, or a mix of factors.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/the-new-york-times-wmd-coverage
https://www.smh.com.au/opinion/the-new-york-times-role-in-promoting-war-on-iraq-20040323-gdilbl.html