I'll never (with exceptions, but this isn't one) root for someones death. But I'm sure as fuck not going to shed a tear over him. The kid on the other hand? That's just awful.
Like how you could choose to go buy distilled water or other fluoride free water if you really cared enough? So we agree it's not actually a problem? Cool.
Don't worry, it's on the ballot. I'm hopeful, Missouri has a real weird habit of electing the most batshit right wing people but voting for basically every left leaning ballot measure
I read it less as them shitting on them and more them making a joke about how things tend to immediately go wrong the second you say anything positive about it.
Using the amount of total registered voters in each respective state and a 95% CI, we get the following margins of error
MI: ±3.939%
PA: ±3.723%
WI: ±3.811%
Depending on the exact lead (NYT only shows round percents, not specific numbers for each response), all of those are potentially within the top end of that margin of error.
Am I trying to claim that a swing from being down by ~4% to being up by ~4% means nothing and is indicative of nothing? Of course not. But man, most people really do not at all understand how statistics work, and I really wish people would stop talking out of their ass about it.
Everyone? No, far from it. But many events, some jobs, etc. required a negative test result for entry. There was absolutely far more asymptomatic getting tested then.
I'll never (with exceptions, but this isn't one) root for someones death. But I'm sure as fuck not going to shed a tear over him. The kid on the other hand? That's just awful.