Skip Navigation

Posts
293
Comments
2233
Joined
3 yr. ago

No one of consequence.

  • Its their job to say that and prepare anyway

  • You can do that now. They are called company towns.

  • Videos @lemmy.world

    What is the Ultraviolet Catastrophe?

  • Hat man?

  • As far as I know this user is a dog

  • Not quite what you're asking, but xfce has a Chicago 95 mod to make it look like win95.

  • Idk I've seen better in the amateur section

  • Does a verification equate to an endorsement now?

    Never been the case, tho many do interpret it to be that way.

  • Videos @lemmy.world

    Naughty English - Austin Powers in Goldmember (3/5) Movie CLIP (2002) HD

  • Videos @lemmy.world

    Daft Hands - Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger

  • unixporn @lemmy.world

    Ultimate Beginners Linux Ricing Guide

  • Videos @lemmy.world

    In Defence of the Spreadsheet, Reluctantly

  • Maybe limit the bot to only copy the top post that week.

  • Feels like accident forgiveness from insurance, right

  • I have no problem calling flock or facebooks tech stack bad because the intentions behind the tech are immoral.

    And did those assemble themselves to be evil? Or did someone make them that way?

    To go back go my openCV example it is just tech. It does not become a lpr with a cop back end until flock configures it that way

    The engineers who help make immoral things possible should think about that

    Yes, exactly my point.

  • People are the ones who do things with tech; hence they are responsible for the actions. Tech is just an object with no will of its own to do right or wrong.

  • that it is not interesting to talk about the ethics of some technology in an abstraction in cases where the actual tech is as it is actually implemented is clearly bad.

    But that is what you are doing and I am saying that it is people who are responsible for the implementation.

  • People who have literally made tools to do bad things justified it by claiming that tech is neutral in an abstract sense

    Bold a keyword there for you

  • This issue with asserting that technology is neutral is it lets the people who develop it ignore the impacts of their work.

    I don't see how that is the case. The tech is neutral, but the engineers know what the application they are hired for is. That is determined by people and subject to morality.

    Would you say openCV or the people working on it are evil? I wouldn't. I would say that once someone takes that project for flock is evil.

    I think this framing is more important when talking with the general public as they are likely to walk away thinking that its the tech that creates problems and not the for profit corporations who will be free to continue doing the same, so long as they don't use that tech.

  • Videos @lemmy.world

    24 Hours in the Richest vs the Poorest City in America

  • Videos @lemmy.world

    How to Safely Visit Abandoned Places

  • Videos @lemmy.world

    This Is How You Get JARHEAD Sequels

  • THE POLICE PROBLEM @lemmy.world

    Expected pig mindset

  • Videos @lemmy.world

    Real Images Of TITAN Shows that Something is Off

  • Anarchism @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    Gadgets For People Who Don't Trust The Government

  • Videos @lemmy.world

    Gadgets For People Who Don't Trust The Government

  • Videos @lemmy.world

    Extinct Animals That May Still Be Alive

  • Videos @lemmy.world

    I tried (and failed) to ditch Spotify for an iPod

  • Ukraine @sopuli.xyz

    Evolution of Russian Tactics

  • Videos @lemmy.world

    Mathematically extra-complicated Secretest Santa 2025

  • Videos @lemmy.world

    I taught an octopus piano (It took 6 months)

  • Videos @lemmy.world

    What 10 Years On YouTube Has Taught Me (That YouTube Won't Tell You) | Stoked Matty

  • privacy @lemmy.ca

    This Flock Camera Leak is like Netflix For Stalkers