What the shooter did = straight up murder.

What the victim did = sorta, kinda, mass murder, but also legal because the US is a broken country.

I’m still not sure why you’re so certain about this. You’re speculating that something might happen and yet you said that there’s a “100%” chance of US boots on the ground in Iran.

As awful as Trump is, his first term wasn’t nearly as hawkish at that of other republican presidents.

Superhero movies and soy beans.

That doesn’t necessarily equate to there being a 100% certainty of boots on the ground in Iran though, does it?

No there’s not. Where are you getting this absolute certainty from?

There’s no pressure on them to support progressive policies in a 2 party system. All they have to do is wait until Trump’s administration shits the bed and they’ll win again.

I’m not sure we’re on a path to WWIII if it’s Russia vs everyone else. If China decides to get involved then maybe but I don’t see any evidence they’re willing to throw in with Putin, same with Iran.

The Kubrick stare.

“In his first response to the ICC issuing a warrant for his arrest on allegations of war crimes, Benjamin Netanyahu’s office has described the ruling as “absurd and false lies” and said the decision is “antisemitic.””

Looks like Netanyahu’s campaign to render the word “antisemetic” as completely meaningless continues.

Release the Pedofiles!

No U.

I suspect the powers that be will let this orange chucklefuck have a little fun but if he really starts eating into their profits and refuses to back off, he’s going to have an accident.

At this point I’m worried about the leopards. Those guys are going to be battling chronic obesity very soon.

The toddlers are going to be running the day care. Buckle up.

Here comes the kakistocracy.

You could, but they have over $4 billion in cash just sitting around.

Thats how words work u use combine multiple concepts together to create a new things that encapsules the whole.

Sure, you didn’t do that though. Let’s take the second item, “The existence of systemic oppression and power imbalances”

That’s the original definition, not what right wingers use to deflect away from the original. You’re all over the place.

For instance if u where to define a table as having legs a table top etc then some moron claimed well i have legs ur definition sucks that wouldnt be a good faith interpretation would it?

I’m interpreting in good faith, the problem is on your side. You’re trying (and failing) to assign a definition to something that doesn’t have one other than “anything mush-brained right wingers don’t like”. Just accept it instead of tying your brain in knots.

Do u have an alternative word u would prefer me to use instead of woke to describe the outlined definition i provided?

You didn’t provide a definition, for instance “The importance of group identity over individual identity”. You might as well be talking about communism, or the military, or a sports team.