A lot fucking less than the internet would have you believe. Take a second and examine all your evidence for believing "there are people who actually hold this opinion". Does it all come from the internet? Almost entirely from no-context screenshots or clips that seem suspiciously scripted? Do you think maybe those aren't the best sources?
That's the problem every time these fake as shit posts are created. There are always folks in the comments that rush to defend it by going "well it might be fake THIS time, but it sounds like something that COULD happen, so I'm gonna still file it away as evidence that it does."
Like, I'm sure SOME people exist like that. There are 8.3 billion people in this world, that's enough that you can always find a handful that believe anything. There is a non-zero number of people that enjoy eating literal shit, but that doesn't mean they are everywhere.
And before you say it (because this is always the reply), if your evidence for their existence is the results of elections or the abundance of stupid people, that is faulty logic. There is an ocean of separation between people who are simply idiots, and those that actually hold opinions like "Libraries are a waste cuz they're full of books. Why book when internet?"
This may come as a surprise to you, but you can both condemn Trump's actions AND recognize that Maduro was an illegitimate leader that stole an election according to every third-party audit. And not just like "well it was close, who's to say who really won?" but like the votes went 2-1 to his opponent. He lost BAD, but decided to lie, cling to power and attempt to imprison his opponent. Maduro is a vicious dictator and calling him an illegitimate leader is not just a claim, it's a fact.
And yes, it's also true that Trump's actions were an illegal act of war. Full stop. No questions at all there. But the people trying to condemn this by making Maduro out to be some innocent saint are either trolls ignoring his corruption, or people so ignorant as to the situation that they should maybe just shut the fuck up until they spend more than 2 minutes learning about it.
As a child, the ocean fascinated me. I wanted to learn everything I could. As I got older, and the world got worse, the things I learned grew more and more terrifying, until I eventually stopped trying to learn more because it was just too depressing.
I don't know how Marine Biologists and Oceanographers do it. To be surrounded every day with thousands of indicators and unquestionable data that all shows our oceans are fucked. And from hundreds of different ways too; it doesn't even matter if you somehow fix global warming, there are so many other issues remaining that it's still all fucked. It's like if a guy walked into a hospital with every disease. Where the hell do you even start?
And then we should get all the world leaders in a big room and tell them they're being bad. Then they'll all sing and hold hands and stop all wars. And then later my mommy can make us all dino nuggies and we can watch Trollhunters on Netflix.
Fuuuuck that. I'm not some breeder with an animalistic urge to spread my seed and bring an unwilling life into this shitty world that's already dealing with overpopulation. How incredibly selfish and irresponsible do you have to be?
And the Lakota Sioux took it from the Cheyenne tribe by arrow point only 100 years prior to that. So yea, the Sioux had the land stolen from them by force, but they stole it by force themselves before that. And by this point, the US has controlled the land longer than the Sioux ever did.
On the other hand, the US did have a formal treaty with the Sioux that granted them the land which the US willfully broke when gold was discovered.
It's tempting, it's really tempting. It's easy not to downvote an unpopular opinion, but when it's a really fucking stupid opinion as well.... Ooooh I really wanna push that button.
Am I understanding that article right? Not only is the female a parasite on a different crustacean and loses all its libs and organs until it is just a sac with tendrils snaking through its host; but the male also attaches to the female while it's in that sac state, and also loses all its limbs and organs until it is just a set of gonads? That's the weirdest fucking lifecycle I've ever heard of.
Anyone who has such an insanely incorrect sense of scale that they even begin to consider a single icebreaker ship as having any sort of measurable impact compared to the sheer size of the Arctic is, indeed, silly in my book.
It's a fair question in the same way asking if a speck of dust is an effective barrier against a tank is a fair question.
A lot fucking less than the internet would have you believe. Take a second and examine all your evidence for believing "there are people who actually hold this opinion". Does it all come from the internet? Almost entirely from no-context screenshots or clips that seem suspiciously scripted? Do you think maybe those aren't the best sources?
That's the problem every time these fake as shit posts are created. There are always folks in the comments that rush to defend it by going "well it might be fake THIS time, but it sounds like something that COULD happen, so I'm gonna still file it away as evidence that it does."
Like, I'm sure SOME people exist like that. There are 8.3 billion people in this world, that's enough that you can always find a handful that believe anything. There is a non-zero number of people that enjoy eating literal shit, but that doesn't mean they are everywhere.
And before you say it (because this is always the reply), if your evidence for their existence is the results of elections or the abundance of stupid people, that is faulty logic. There is an ocean of separation between people who are simply idiots, and those that actually hold opinions like "Libraries are a waste cuz they're full of books. Why book when internet?"