While I understand the desire for medical confidentiality, I think when it comes to space travel, the public, or at very least the scientific community, deserves to know some details. It's not like we're swimming in data about medical emergencies in zero-G, every little bit is important.
This person is likely not from Greenland. There are only ~40k people in Greenland and only 10-15% of the population have working English, although more can understand it. Thats 6k people that could have crafted that message, and of that we can assume that only a minority would use reddit. That leaves maybe a couple thousand people.
I'm not saying it couldn't be a Greenlander, but the odds are much higher that this is just a random person from Europe, or even an angry American.
So this brings up an interesting question, what qualifies as "tool use"? Google's answer seems vague and too broad. Are hermit crabs tool users? What about those crabs that carry around sea anemones to use as weapons? What about lacewing larva, also known as trash bugs? They carry a lot of debris on their back to use as camouflage.
What about beavers? They build dams. What about birds? Yea, crows and parrots obviously, but almost all birds build nests.
I've job hopped a lot, and literally no company has ever asked for my social media besides indeed, which I keep sterile clean. Actually, they've never even specifically asked for that either, that's just where I've applied through.
A different article I read earlier (sorry, it's too early and I'm too lazy to go looking for it) painted this in a slightly different light btw.
The kid didn't kill his dad because he was mad he got his Switch taken away. He got his Switch taken away, snuck into his parents room to go looking for it, found the gun instead, and started playing with it. Then he accidentally shot his dad with it.
That is a MUCH different story than "psychopathic child murders his father over a video game". But hey, anything to avoid a headline that insinuates guns themselves are the problem.
Malley’s does not disclose where they source materials for their chocolates, but they did indicate that their cocoa, milk, and sugar all come from outside of northeast Ohio, bringing a tale of globalization full circle.
Wait, you're telling me they don't use locally grown cocoa beans from Ohio, a place with a climate wholly unsuited toward cocoa production? Who could have known!?
Yea, Caucasian food only includes things like pizza, which as we all know, is universally hated and enjoyed by no one around the globe. Italian food? French food? All garbage!
Yea, who needs dumb things like "visible progress within my lifetime"? It barely took 40000 years to go from stone to bronze, that should be good enough for anyone!
Just another flavor of cynicism for me. Before AI, I would look at most "cute" animal videos and just see an animal performing a trained trick under the guise of "Omg, LOOK my dogs love spontaneously hugging each other, isn't that cute??!!"
Your cynical take is far more optimistic than mine. I am more of the opinion that these incidents will be treated like the race massacres from post-civil war reconstruction: almost entirely forgotten and barely talked about. Actually, it will be even more forgotten than those. People died in those incidents by the thousands. No one is going to remember a few protests with a handful of injuries.
I think Neelix gets the Jar Jar comparison because he's an alien, but I believe there is a worse character on the show that no one ever talks about.
Tom Paris. I don't understand how this guy is not more disliked by the fanbase. He's the kind of person that would sleep in a racecar bed. Neelix is annoying, but every single scene with Tom is just so fucking awkward. He is a 9 year old in a star fleet officer's body. He'd be tolerable as a side character, but as a main character he's just so grating.
I'll take Cooking with Neelix over Tom Paris pretending he's Captain Proton.
It's a bit more complex than that, it's not a straightforward text prompt as they did attempt to have filters to prevent stuff like this. However, this being a Musk company, those filters are shitty and people quickly found ways to bypass it, likely through a series of prompts or very highly tailored prompts.
But thats just the nature of AI. AI generators are never specifically trained using CSAM (at least I really fucking hope not). But neither are they specifically trained to generate giraffes made out of dumplings dancing on the concept of time. However, if you ask it to make the latter, it will dutifully spit out some slop that matches. The point is, AI image generators can make ANYTHING, or at least try to. That's what they do. You can build filters and put in restrictions to try to prevent users from asking it to make certain things, or prevent those things from getting delivered, but the actual ability for the AI to make those things is still there. And due to the black box nature of machine learning, it can never actually be removed.
Now, there is a VERY big argument to be made against AI as a whole for that reason. If you spend a little while thinking about what it actually means to have something with the ability to create ANYTHING, or at least an approximation of it, you should be scared shitless. The only real safeguards are creating filters on either the input or the output side, but filters can be worked around. You could see it with early versions of things like ChatGPT, where you could create a carefully worded prompt to have it create a duplicate version of itself with the filters removed and return a secondary response from that duplicated instance, leading to it replying to normally off-limit topics (like building explosives or committing suicide) with a generic "I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.", followed by another response that gives the full, unredacted answer. Because it always has the ability to create these things, it's just company created filters which stop it from showing them.
Anyways, this comment has gotten away from me. The point is, it's not really about Grok. It's not really about CSAM. It's about AI as a whole, but that's too big and abstract of a concept for the masses to grasp. So instead we get articles and legislation specifically dealing with one particular issue from one particular program because that's just the first thing people have become outraged at, without seeing the big picture.
TL;DR: No, it's not as simple as a straightforward prompt, and it's far from just Grok that is at issue.
While I understand the desire for medical confidentiality, I think when it comes to space travel, the public, or at very least the scientific community, deserves to know some details. It's not like we're swimming in data about medical emergencies in zero-G, every little bit is important.