Blanet statements like this are always wrong. Architecture needs to be a result of finding the correct solutions to problems. For instance, if you're building a browser game you don't want to be using the server side for rendering.
Most people have bad taste. Most developers are not able to discern quality from bullshit. You see it every day. People enslaved by the news, by religion, by politics. OpenClaw is a fad like most of the other garbage out there. It uses 1000x the tokens of a normal AI user so obviously the AI wholesalers are paying attention. They want AI adoption and to maximize token usage. Remember the crypto bros punting web 3.0 as the world changing idea of the century? Well now it's easy to see that was garbage and it will be easy to see this paradigm of giving an insecure system access to all your shit is a bad idea in the near future.
Well, cockmushroom, then you're building a pretty expensive dashboard. I still don't see how they are going to differentiate between normal browsing and bot crawling. I don't think that's an exact science.
My boy was fiv+ and he lasted 15 years after contracting it at age 9. He didn't get sick often and when he was younger he could go years without any issues but as he got older he developed kidney/liver issues and food sensitivity to even the best dry/wet foods. In the end he only ate tuna and boiled chicken breast. Every animal is going to be different and you just have to deal with things as they come up.
Maybe I'm old, but I completely agree with you. There is a natural tendency to try reinvent something when you don't understand it enough to be comfortable with it. Then that new thing lacks the maturity and scrutiny that the old thing went through to survive the test of time. This is basically how overconfident tech bros are transforming the web.
I have a NPU for no fucking reason