Skip Navigation

Posts
1
Comments
4
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • When I read this this morning, I had concerns, but then I did some research. The SDKs source is fully available for all to look at and compile. The main issue that people bring up is the license that states:

     
        
    3.3 You may not use this SDK to develop applications for use with software other
    than Bitwarden (including non-compatible implementations of Bitwarden) or to
    develop another SDK.
    
      

    This part seems to be what most people take issue with, as it makes the sdk no longer modifiable, yet a requirement of the core source itself. The head of BitWarden has come out and stated the SDK being required to compile BitWarden was a mistake, however, and if this proves to be true (which I have no reason to doubt) then I see no reason why any of this is an issue.

    From a security standpoint, since the SDK is source available, it can be audited by anyone still (and compiled) so personally, I'm fine with this.

  • I used AI to summarize the different Google products and services listed in the video along with their suggested alternatives and timestamps. AI is pretty cool sometimes.

  • cats @lemmy.world

    Willow has strong opinions about Reddit's API Changes