Just to be clear: you think it’s the AI skeptics whose views are faith-like, and you give me an appeal to authority to back that up?

It’s not the paper here so much as the signers that are the problem (though the NYT is more than happy to platform the worst people)

Stop repeating corpo criti-hype

Don’t buy the criti-hype

Gross

Or, you know, the bartenders could own the bar

The sober (sicker) quitters phenomenon that messed up this data for so long is fascinating!

Sorry about your adaptive preference for not owning media, but a better world is possible, friend, and this legal precedent merely reaffirms the first sale doctrine that has always applied to other types of media but that lawmakers in your jurisdiction declined to enact as a handout to corporations as new media came along.

Looks like a bunch of headlines about the same story

A non-Google link: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/10/housing-bill-becomes-law-without-trump-veto

DeepL

All my homies hate FISA

Maybe not:

Huh, who could have predicted this?

Yeah but are they imported from Japan?

Process knowledge vs. bosses

Laundering the reputations of the rich

I thought it was guns

Of course moral reasoning shows up in a brain scan if materialism is true. The important point was about something a person is responsible for versus not.

Seems more like a lack of empathy than brain capacity. Moral and intellectual defects are not the same.