I’ll go against the grain on this one, I actually think something akin to this is the right approach.
“Protect the children” will have to go somewhere, it’s not going to just die. Getting kids devices, with locked down access is better than the ridiculous changes to the internet that are being planned.
This might not be the right implementation, but I think the idea is along the right lines… or at least, the least worst option.
I don’t know how much hackery and fuckery there is with docker specifically. The majority of what docker does was already present in the Linux kernel namespaces, cgroups etc. Docker just made it easier to build and ship the isolated environments between systems.
Sounds like a skill issue. Just need to be careful how you wash it, don’t leave it wet and re-season every now and then. None of that takes any more time than going to the shop to replace the teflon pan that’s gotten chipped.
Ah, I’m not giving a full picture there. Technically you can use layered encryption like tor uses on the clearnet. Tor additionally exposes tor-only services that route exclusively via tor’s onion routing (not just http wrapped inside an encryption onion).
i2p works differently under the hood, but the shared piece is exclusive services, only accessible through a non-standard protocol. That’s how you’d get a different web. Unless we’re talking physical layer stuff.
That’s sure to get a rise outta the police