I know so many people who regularly fall for this sort of thing, even when they know it's not actually a deal or something they need.
- Posts
- 0
- Comments
- 398
- Joined
- 1 yr. ago
- Posts
- 0
- Comments
- 398
- Joined
- 1 yr. ago
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
To be honest, I'm so sexual-relationsing old that I remember when the word meme actually meant something before it was appropriated and adapted for use to refer to the digital images we share electronically after adding text over them.
I'm an owner of a rescue dog with behavioral problems, and I am fortunate to say that the only person my dog has ever bitten after I adopter her is me. It takes a lot of work and effort, and I am absolutely certain she would bite other people under the right circumstances. Problem is, most dog owners are not like me.
Granted my rescue dog is a small Chihuahua mix, so at worse, she might break skin on your finger or heels and leave a small scar.
Very different circumstances than if she were a big dog.
Here's my purely capitalistic problem with Amazon:
A decade+ ago, I realized that major brands were using the site as their outlet store. I'd buy a pack of socks, and they'd be hideously deformed. I'd buy a few pants for work, one pair would be too small, one too large, and one would fit just right. I'm not fucking Goldilocks.
The final straw for me was when my coffee maker broke. I ordered a new one via same day shipping, which at the time had a minimum order of something like $50. The coffee maker did not cost quite enough, so I added something random to the order so that my same day shipping would be free. Ultimately, the coffee maker arrived late (i.e. not the same day) and the decanter was broken.
When I contacted Amazon about the issue, the agent said they could reship, but they wouldn't send it same day so for that specific item it was going to take 3 - 5 days to arrive. They also tried to hassle me with a straight up return, telling me I had to take it to a UPS store, which at the time was 30+ minutes away.
Ultimately, I pulled a Karen and told them to cancel my Amazon Prime, which they did. Only problem is, I was 2 or 3 months into the year long subscription and assumed I'd get a pro-rated refund. I did not. When I got back in touch with customer service, they told me that Amazon adds up the value of the "free" shipping I received, the rental value of the movies and shows I watched on Prime, and the value of all the other services included with Prime and if that total exceeds the remaining value of the Prime subscription, then no refund.
They basically stole almost a year of Prime from me with no recourse.
Scum company. I got a lot of hate for saying this back in those days. But at least now, a decade+ later, people are finally starting to wake up. Not everyone, obviously. But at least I don't get hateful responses and DMs quite as much as I used to.
It doesn't matter one way or the other, but there's either some manner of miscommunication / misunderstanding going on here or that's not completely accurate / applicable to the relatives I mentioned.
For instance, I found this:
A couple of things to note: I did actually look around a bit and found multiple sources that suggest the same, just that the one I linked to said it most concisely and one of the states my relatives lived in is on that list. Obviously I'm not claiming that those sources are more accurate than your professional expertise, and I'm aware that just because it's on the internet doesn't make it true. Also, wanted to reiterate that this happened decades ago, which makes me wonder if things could have been a little different back then.
For sure! I'd love to switch to solar (or any alternative carbon-friendly / carbon-neutral energy source) entirely and specifically for the perceived environmental benefits. But I'm also not in a financial position where I can do it when it happens to cost so much more than traditional means. If I had been fortunate enough, like my neighbor, to have been in the position to make the plunge 10 - 15 years ago, it would make perfect sense. But with all the government subsidies being cut, the power company drastically reducing what they pay for the excess energy, and the cost of batteries plus associated equipment being so high, it's pushing solar back into the territory of being unaffordable for a lot of people. Really sad in so many ways. And yet, I'm still trying to figure out how I might make it work.
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
I somewhat agree, but I bet it's a bit more complicated than that. Whether rooted in reality or not, part of me thinks that a lot of those 80 million people (if the numbers I saw are accurate) are comprised of children and some quantity of people who can't or aren't really mentally competent enough to make rational voting decisions. Feels like it's hurting the most vulnerable, rather than the people who are literally asking for it.
Mostly, I'm just a little surprised to hear that the number is so high. If 25% of the population alone is on medicaid, and assuming there's any where near comparable percentage of people on medicare, it's hard to understand the argument against universal and/or single payer healthcare systems.
I don't recall the exact timeline, but about 10 - 15 years ago my neighbor got a bunch of solar panels installed. Between state and federal funding, almost 2/3rds of the cost was subsidized. On top of that, the local power company pays 1-to-1 for the energy she produces during the day because she is grandfathered in. Her power bill maxes out at something like $30.
I was strongly considering getting solar panels for my house in recent history. The power company no longer pays 1-to-1 for new installations, they only pay approximately 30%. So if they charge 18 cents per kilowatt hour, they'd only credit me 6 cents. On top of this, the state I live in no longer offers tax incentives, so the only thing I had going for me was the federal incentives. Even at that, it wasn't worth it from a purely economic standpoint when I did the calculations.
The icing on the cake is that when the power goes out, you still lose power even if you have solar panels. The only way around that in my part of the world is to go completely off grid, buy a bunch of extremely expensive equipment and batteries, or to have someone do an illegal connection.
So, we came to conclusion that solar wasn't really affordable for us. The monthly payments on the loan were going to be about 20% higher than our current electric bill and by our calculations, it was going to take about 17 - 20 years to break even. And that's only if the equipment lasts that long, which is a gamble given our weather that includes hurricanes, tornadoes, and so on.
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
I forget where I read this recently and I can't confirm the veracity of this claim, but supposedly 80 million Americans are on Medicaid. If that's true, that's close to 1/4 of all Americans that would be affected by this.
I watched the sequel with a heavy beer buzz on new years eve so I could probably watch it again and it would be like a second sequel because I can't really say I remember much about the first time I watched it.
- JumpNSFW
rtbrtrtnty
Would a styrofoam cup actually stay in reasonably good shape for 400 years after being buried?
Mostly a curiosity thing. I sometimes use styrofoam peanuts in planters for drainage purposes, and after a single growing season, they've already started to show signs of degrading. Not that microplastics are a good thing, but it also makes me wonder if they would actually stick around in good condition for 400 years.
It's 2025 and there are still way too many people who utterly refuse to understand that heterosexuality is a choice. Just kidding.
I'm honestly sad that anyone would feel this way, because of the implications. Having said that, I understand why you'd feel that way, even if the presentation is regrettable.
If my statement could be interpreted in any way congruent to your first paragraph, then there's clearly been a significant degree of miscommunication and/or misunderstanding.
I've reread my statement and there's no mention of shopping around for the best deal, so I'm going to chalk that one up to you misunderstanding what I wrote. As for the use of smorgasbord, I understand that it might suggest abundance in some way, though in my part of the world it generally conveys the concept of variety more so than abundance. Either way I chalk that up to miscommunication on my part.
I already mentioned it: I firmly believe that if there's any chance of stopping this mess, it's going to require working together and finding common ground with everyone who has been harmed, regardless of voting history, political affiliation, morals, and rationale. Divided we fall. We've already seen how being divided works out.
I have family members who moved from state to state around 20 years ago until they found one that would approve their disability statuses so they no longer had to work and would qualify for the whole smorgasbord of government assistance programs including medicaid.
They think most people who are receiving these benefits are just lazy and that there would be more money for people like themselves who need that money if these programs were slashed. They believe only those other (i.e. lazy) people will lose benefits.
There's literally no reasoning with that mentality. They seem to think this is all entertaining.
I guarantee you that once they are personally affected, and I'm pretty sure they will be affected at some point, they'll turn on this administration.
I have many problems with this, but the hardest pill to swallow is that I'm going to have to be the bigger person and accept them with open arms because at the end of the day there's no stopping this unless we're all united.
How much butter could a butter churn churn if a butter churn could churn butter? I asked AI and it gave me this big long explanation that started with the history of butter churning and ended up with some facts about the traditional way of making yak butter which I did not even know was a thing but it is and that thing is butter.