Gloomy

Unrelated, aber interessant. In dem von dir verlinkten Dokument wird der Verlust des gesamten männlichen Penis mit 50 Recht hoch angesetzt (unter Punkt 13). Ein Verlust der Klitoris (durch z.B. Zwangsbeachneidung oder Unfall) kommt gar nicht erst vor. Der Verlust eines Eierstocks oder der Gebärmutter wird mit 0 bewertet, außer er geschieht “in jüngere Alter bei bei noch bestehendem Kinderwunsch” (Alles unter Punk 14).

Ich bin da wahrlich kein Experte und nicht in der Materie drin, aber das richt schon ein bisschen nach Listen, die alte weiße Männer mal erstellt haben und die sich hartnäckig halten. Ist jetzt erst mal mehr ein Gefühl als ein Fakt aber.

I just saw a video about this some days ago.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlUDzIhqDDw

Sort of, ay.

The judge said Kurtaj’s skills and desire to commit cyber-crime meant he remained a high risk to the public.

He will remain at a secure hospital for life unless doctors deem him no longer a danger.

The court heard that Kurtaj had been violent while in custody with dozens of reports of injury or property damage.

Doctors deemed Kurtaj unfit to stand trial due to his severe autism so the jury was asked to determine whether or not he committed the alleged acts - not if he did so with criminal intent.

So funktioniert das leider nicht. Einfach veranlagte Menschen brauchen einfache Märchen, die ihnen die Welt erklären und ihnen sagen, wie sie sich verhalten sollen (und warum sie besser sind, als die anderen…). Ohne Religion suchen die sich einfach ein anderes absurd übersimplifiziertes Weltbild, dass sie entgegen aller Realität verherrlichen können.

In diesem Post lautet das Märchen / übersimplizifizierte Weltbild: Alle Regionen und religiösen Menschen sind simple, einfach gestrickte religiöse Fanatiker.

Das ist mir zu schlicht gedacht. Und macht dann halt Religiöse Menschen zu den von dir erwähnten “Anderen”, die so viel schlechter sind als man selbst.

I agree, if you feel it is affecting your mental health you should by all means take care of yourself and avoid it. I can understand how this is sensible.

But why the block? Why not disagree and move on with your life?

0

I won’t block different perspectives. If I disagree I disagree and move on, but why block somebody? I think it is important to have your believes challenged.

This is so fucking cringe that it hurts my brain every time they say it.

Shhh. Let Linus Finnish.

It’s the same meme, but younger and fresher.

Not 20 years later, but at all. At least that I’d their claim and I haven’t seen it debunked do far.

I’ll reluctantly link a right wing article that at least tries to come across not overly sensational:

The Free Beacon also obtained a copy of Harris’s October 1987 job application for a law clerk position in the Alameda County district attorney’s office. On that form, Harris, who was in law school at the time, listed several jobs—including a month-long clerical job at a stock brokerage—in a section that asked her to list every position she held in the last 10 years. McDonald’s is absent.

Harris lists three jobs on the application and five in total on an attached résumé, according to the documents, obtained through a public records request. Harris, who submitted the application as a second-year student at then-University of California, Hastings College of the Law, included granular life experience on her résumé—“extensive travel in India, Africa, [and] Europe” and “lived in Montreal, Canada for six years”—but not McDonald’s.

They’ve got photos of the resume and all.

The right is losing it because Harris said she worked at a McD bad has shown no prove of it.

Possible she never has and it’s a lie to appeal to the working class voters. Or not. I honestly dgaf.

This right is behaving as if Trump never told a single lie in his long life. It’s Harris making a claim without backing it up has been THE THING all week now on most right wing forums I peek at.

In meinem Freundeskreis kam das mit dem älter werden. Mit 20 gab es noch trinken bis zum Blackout, ab so 25, ab 26, 27 wurde dann der alkoholfreie Kasten regelmäßig vor Ende der Feier leer während der Kasten mit Bier kaum angerührt war. Und das war noch vor der Kinder-Krieg Welle im Freundeskreis.

“Wir sollten zukünftig noch stärker betonen, dass der katholische oder der konfessionell-kooperativ erteile Religionsunterricht auch offen für konfessionslose Schülerinnen und Schüler ist”, sagte Kopp.

Nene, danke, aber nein danke. Ich bin ganz froh das meine Kinder nicht mehr als nötig mit religiöser Propaganda in Berührung kommen werden. Jeder darf natürlich religiös sein wie er oder sie will, aber die Entscheidung ob eine Religion (und wenn dann welche) darf dann doch bitte jeder Mensch treffen, wenn er oder sie das reflektiert tun kann.

I disagree.

Evolution is not so much a numbers game. Otherwise Bacteria, Ants, Viruses and the like would have to be crowned winners. So the point op brings up is mute moot.

The point you add, that they keep reproducing, is also not relevant in evelotionary terms. The short amount of time that we have domesticated chickens, let a side the very resent industalisation of animal farming (it started in the 1950s ish), is just not relevante in evelotionary terms.

I’d say what makes a successfull species is resilience. 99 % of all species have gone extinct. The “winners” of evelotion are, in my opinion, those species that have lasted the longest. And in that regard, chicken ain’t looking to good. They are highly dependent upon humans. Most industrial chickens are genetic aborninatons, bred for beeing fat, fast growing, egg laying machines to the point where their own bones brake because they lack calcium. I’d argue that chickens in their current form would not last long in “the wild”. Hence once humans are gone their is a high chance chickens will follow.

Chickens are the most numerous bird on the planet

And live their lives in fucking misery and suffering, at least most of em.

I thought the same :-).

Tough, the books make quite the point that it is not “human” intellegence they have.

And this is it. This is how we arrived where we are now.

Nature? KILL IT! EXTERMINATE IT!

We’ve spend 2000 years slowly beeting nature to our wims. It has destroyed the planets ecosystem on a scale only seen by planet wide desasters in the past. We have driven countless species into extinction, and still counting. We take without any regard or resecpt for anything then our own needs.

That is exactly the mindset the comment I am replying to has to me.

Yeah, but try saying something slightly to nuanced about the Israel - Palestine situation almost anywhere here and you get nuked.

Masnick gives 20 levels of development. Elon stopped here:

Level Two: “We’re the free speech platform! But no CSAM!”

And that’s about it. Ex-Twitter has copyright infringement, hate speech and doesn’t give a fuck about local laws unless the law actually has teeth (Brasil, anybody?).