C'mon man, there's a lot of things to be said for how braindead of a take OP's is, but throwing slurs around isn't the play either.
Or, think about it this way: suggesting they were born facing serious mental and intellectual struggles is excusing their behaviour. This isn't something they did because they were born unlucky. It's a choice they made. They should have to own that, and we should hold them accountable as best as we can.
To be clear, I am extremely pro-immigration, but many of the immigration policies as written are tools used to suppress wages. This is the reason we see so many immigrants, often with degrees and training we refuse to recognize in Canada, in low paying, minimum wage jobs. I personally had the pleasure of working with a wonderful woman from the middle east who was a qualified teacher, stuck working 30 hours a week in a grocery store deli because we refused to recognize her degree or decade of experience. She spoke perfect English, was incredibly pleasant, and visibly intelligent and well-mannered, but she's a brown immigrant, so fuck it, minimum wage for her.
We can take immigrants at the rate we have been while not using them to further wealth inequalities. But as a friend of mine says, the purpose of a system is what it does, and the current iteration is not about creating a multi-cultural nation.
For additional clarity, this isn't to say that you're wrong and immigration isn't being used as a scapegoat. I'd just argue that the problem is more substantial than simply calling the issue a scapegoat suggests. There is a real problem, but it's not in that we're accepting immigrants at all; it's the conditions we've agreed to accept them under.
Feverishly replacing your one-liners with long-winded lies, you mean? It was nice to see how under your skin I am, but honestly man, let the hatred go. Maybe it'll be easier to engage with reality.
Yikes, you are crashing out really hard right now. This must be very frustrating for you.
The only thing I've said in your entire mind break is that Xi Jiping is a dictator. Which, by defintion through control of every facet of the government and media of China, he is.
Sorry you seem to think white people are superior for some reason. No race is, but it must be hard to see the world through that lens all the time.
Yeah, that's what I figured. So boringly ungenuine that you can't even admit you made a mistake, and linked to some argument I wasn't a part of. At least I know I was right to say you don't deserve an honest argument.
Ah well, until the next time I see your fascist ass posting lies, I guess.
There's really nothing racist about picking on a dictator, but it's nice to know you genuinely don't know what oppression looks like. I hope one day the whole world can be as ignorant of the concept as you are. It'd certainly be a much better place to live.
Let me guess, hypocritical projection? I assume all your "facts" are written by deepseek, then. It would explain the way you skirt actual points while cherry picking Chinese state propaganda.
Speaking of skirting points, you're just going to try and misdirect from the fact that I'm not even in the thread you claimed I ran from? Lie better, Yog. It's going to get harder and harder for your .ml buddies to pump you up if you keep embarrassing yourself like this.
He tells me to go back to reddit, and then devolves to using Reddit argument soyjacks. I'd ask you if you have any shame, but we both know you don't. Hypocrisy is all that's in your toolkit.
You know what, that's fair, you got me on this one. I did not even look and dismissed the things you posted as obviously biased because I don't trust you. Though, let's be honest: why wouldn't I? Let's go take a glance at the time you linked me a pile of "sources" regarding China's state as a dictstorship. I'd go grab you a link, but honestly,, you're not worth THAT much time.
Oh look, a pile of opinion articles where citizens of China were asked if they think China is democratic, and of course, thanks to the stranglehold over the spread of information in China, the people permitted to answer largely said yes. Meanwhile, the American people rightly pointed out their democracy has been falling into a dictatorship. The benefits of having enough freedom to speak up, even in a nation that is working hard to become as authoritarian as China, are suddenly apparent.
The only "data" I've ever seen you direct anyone to is cherry-picked, misrepresented, or otherwise untrustworthy. You're right, I shouldn't have attacked your sources without seeing what your sources actually are, as that gives you an opportunity to put egg on my face. I still haven't wasted my time checking what version of lying you've engaged with in your link in this thread. But that's exactly the point: it's coming from you, so doing so is a waste of time.
I'll take your point. There are better reasons to remind you, and anyone else in this thread, that every time you post "facts," we're all better off ignoring you and moving along than your sources being sometimes dubious. Sometimes it's cherrypicking. Other times its the misrepresentation of data. This is why we have the word "lie." It's a nice catch-all for tankie trash.
EDIT - Wait, no, I lied, I decided to actually follow your link. I got curious.
What the fuck are you even talking about? I'm not in that thread. You weren't talking to me. How can I "slither away' from your argument if I'm not even in there? Are you delusional, or just making even more shit up that I thought?
Is literally just rewording whatever I said to you back at me all you have? Actually? As they say, imitation is the most sincere form of flattery...
Honestly, building strawmen and replying with an overly eloquent "no u" seems to be your entire repritoire, outside of posting Chinese state propaganda. Perhaps I'm not the one who should be rethinking their material.
Oh, Yog. Punching strawmen and proclaiming himself the heavyweight champion of the world. I never made any of the claims you seem to think I have made. I never even defended Canada's treatment of indigenous peoples. Once again, you make shit up and then claim some kind of moral victory.
I can't take the L when you don't deliver one. The irony of declaring I should "run back to reddit," while you're using the tactics perfected in that space would be cute, if it wasn't so dangerous. It's like seeing an infant play with a gun, really.
You did get one thing right though: I am just trolling you, because that's all you fascist tankies deserve. The only place China's crimes have been "debunked," are in your echo chambers; the rest of the world knows better. Now, in a little tit-for-tat, how about you crawl back to your precious .ml, where you can continue to ban dissenting opinions? It makes it so much easier to lie.
Oh, I'm just fucking with Yog. He's a tankie shill whose only purpose here is to sow discontent with Western nations while talking up his favorite authoritarian states.
Genuinely, I don't see people speak of apartheid with reference to anywhere other than South Africa, and literally any searching of the word directs you back to South Africa, but I'm not so obtuse that I didn't understand his meaning. I just like to drag him for using pseudo-intellectual language in some attempt to elevate his incredibly misguided arguments.
Because, let's be straight, Canada has had a racist history and is still not doing great for its first nations peoples, but to call it a current apartheid state is to dismiss just how badly South African native people's were abused. And if Yog is going to try and dredge up a pointless, dishonest argument like that, I'm going to get him rambling aimlessly.
The only war is class war.