Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)G
Posts
0
Comments
273
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • I literally quoted the word for that exact reason. It just gets really tiring when you talk about AIs and someone always has to make this point. We all know they don't think or understand in the same way we do. No one gains anything by it being pointed out constantly.

  • I mean they literally do analyze text. They're great at it. Give it some text and it will analyze it really well. I do it with code at work all the time.

    Because they are two completely different tasks. Asking them to recall information from their training is a very bad use. Asking them to analyze information passed into them is what they are great at.

    Give it a sample of code and it will very accurately analyse and explain it. Ask it to generate code and the results are wildly varied in accuracy.

    I'm not assuming anything you can literally go and use one right now and see.

  • One of LLMs main strengths over traditional text analysis tools is the ability to "understand" context.

    They are bad at generating factual responses. They are amazing at analysing text.

  • No it's a neural network. They may be over-hyped but they are 100% an AI.

  • August 31, 1955 The term “artificial intelligence” is coined in a proposal for a “2 month, 10 man study of artificial intelligence” submitted by John McCarthy (Dartmouth College), Marvin Minsky (Harvard University), Nathaniel Rochester (IBM), and Claude Shannon (Bell Telephone Laboratories)

    http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/dartmouth/dartmouth.html

    This is just literally not true.

    Point 3 is what LLMs are.

    You are thinking of general artificial intelligence from sci-fi

    An attempt will be made to find how to make machines use language, form abstractions and concepts, solve kinds of problems now reserved for humans,

    This is what artificial intelligence actually means. Solving problems that traditionally require intelligence

    Path finding algorithms in games are AI. And have always been referred to as such. We studied them my AI module at uni.

  • Machine learning is just a specific field in AI. It's all AI. Anything that attempts to mimic intelligence is.

    All the things you mentioned are neural networks which are some of the oldest AIs.

  • Yeah I'm sure every home destroyed was worth over a million. That's just a straw man.

    My home insurance in the UK covers the full cost of tearing down and rebuilding if the house is damaged beyond repair. As it bloody should.

  • If your insurance only covers 50% of the property value it is essentially useless.

    This is absolutely insane.

  • Got to practise firing cannons mate

  • Exactly. Look at the state of it. We definitely should have taken that.

  • In fairness it likely wouldn't be preserved otherwise. So you're welcome.

  • That's why we don't like c

  • Removed

    is this correct?

    Jump
  • Isn't it like made of water?

  • Seems sensible. Check the output of AI tools before posting. Be pretty stupid not to proof read it at a minimum.

  • People need money mate. Not everyone can afford to run a website.

  • It's a problem for users.

  • I'm afraid it won't last long without it. That's the key problem.

    People hate ads, as do I, but what's the alternative?

  • And, for the foreseeable future at least, advertising is a key commercial engine of the internet, and the most efficient way to ensure the majority of content remains free and accessible to as many people as possible.

    I'm afraid they aren't wrong. The majority of people aren't going to pay for access to random blogs etc. So we'd end up with only the big players having usable sites.

    People kick off about ads but rarely suggest an alternative to funding the internet.

    Back in the day ads were targeted based on the website's target audience not the user's personal data. It works fine but is less effective. Don't see why they couldn't go that way.

  • The problem with those sorts of forks is they still require moz to do most of the heavy lifting.

    If Firefox stopped being developed they'd all pretty much freeze in place.