• 0 Posts
  • 53 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 28th, 2023

help-circle



  • Yeah to be fair if you do all the homework with LaTeX there’s no reason not to set up your machine.

    I’ve even heard of someone who even used it to take notes in class… Honestly I wouldn’t dare to try and learn that!

    But yes, that’s when the macros and possibilities you don’t have on overleaf becomes really good to have.


  • Well yes but overleaf makes it possible to work on it with a mate, on any device without having to install anything, and it also saves your progress online so you don’t lose it or forget you document at home.

    If your not seeing were i’m going it’s perfect for school project. Through high school and college i’ve done all my projects with it… I think that’s where it shines.




  • Funkytom467@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlRemade for clarity
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Labour theory of value puts value on goods for the sole purpose of trading and explaining trades. Both LTV and STV does.

    Marx’s use of LVT is to criticize how Capitalism leads to exploitation. But although the specifics differ SVT could still be used to raise the same critiques.


  • Its usefulness never made me disappointed despite this drawback.

    I’m a physicist at heart, which might explains it… To me the use in philosophy is just as important, especially in philosophy of science and metaphysics.

    Simply put I couldn’t imagine studying how reality works without ever wandering what it is and how to best study it.


  • Funkytom467@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlRemade for clarity
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Dialectic can never be a science, you can’t apply the same methodology. Even when it’s material.

    However it is philosophy, and if your searching for some material reality then it’s ontology.

    Science too is a product of ontology, it’s a methodology created for this exact purpose and wich can be studied in this field.

    Saying physical properties are social abstractions sounds to me like social constructivism, which is epistemology, again philosophy.

    Social sciences can be soft science precisely when they are not dialectic and rely on the methodology of science.

    And to be clear, soft science is just a science that is based on a hard science, in which we don’t have enough work done to explain every emergent properties using fundamental properties of matter.

    Psychoanalysis is an outdated philosophical theory, so indeed just a scam now.






  • But should it be work?

    Should we really have a society where selling your body is an opportunity to make money.

    For instance, it imply that some poor women are gonna take it regardless the consequence, just because it’s the best alternative to pay the bills.

    I can barely tolerate the physical straining we put on some workers. Sex work’s consequences are unacceptable to me in that same sens, sometimes worse.

    So sure, no matter your opinion we should respect them, and not incriminate them!

    And of course not all sex work is the same… to be acceptable it just requires better conditions. It can’t be something you choose out of need.






  • I still get it, don’t mistake my comment for a lack of compassion.

    It’s especially true for teenagers that gets bullied because of things like it. (Although probably less of a problem for Karens since it’s a rather outdated name.)

    You’d be in the right to be bummed out sure.

    But as adults I don’t think you should hold as much importance to it, it’s how to avoid hurting, lightheartedness and humor is the better response.

    Someone named Karen making fun of Karens is just perfect, and the jokes for someone named motherfucker would write themselves!