First Incompleteness Theorem: “Any consistent formal system F within which a certain amount of elementary arithmetic can be carried out is incomplete; i.e. there are statements of the language of F which can neither be proved nor disproved in F.” (Raatikainen 2020)
Am Ende hatte die DDR also doch Bananen 🍌
Again we are talking about the coffee maker as if it’s the most important part in the quality of your coffee. It’s also how you spot someone pretending to know coffee. Far more important are the beans. After the beans comes your grinder and water quality.
A connaisseur can enjoy every style of coffee making but never bad beans. Industrial type of coffee is mostly on the bad side btw…
These are 50 cm wide half spheres. If you find that comparable to the situation in the picture your appetite must be enormous.
I sadly don’t understand these units and your point is drained in it. The point I want to make is that the “force” of vacuum is limited by the difference of pressures.
You say it changes “drasticly” with area or suction but that is untrue. It changes linearly with area (not drastically) and pressure difference has a maximum. The maximum is defined by the pressure of the vacuum(=0) and the pressure of the ambient air (1 arm). Both are constant so the maximum is constant and actually not that big.
The difference between ambient pressure and inner pressure is always smaller than ambient pressure. Delta p is therefore limited. The force comes from Delta p times contact area which is constant.
I sadly don’t know your units of mass but as I said a perfect vacuum over an area such as the Bowl is as strong as a muscle. The Ravioli will in no world produce a strong vacuum so muscle will win in most cases.
It’s delta p and not fraction p. The difference between ambient pressure and inner pressure (at least zero) is always smaller than ambient pressure. Delta p is therefore limited.
The pressure acts over the area of contact. For a perfect vacuum it would lead to ~1kN of force. This is the same order of magnitude our muscles produce. If you take into account that the vacuum results from cooling over such a small temperature interval the force can’t be too high.
The power of suction is physically limited. That means it either isn’t suction or op is crazy weak. My guess is that the plastic melted (probably not from boiling Temp) or op is strongly exaggerating.
I’m a physicist. If you are an engineer that sounds like a “you” problem.
Es ist quasi Spinat der nach Knoblauch schmeckt. Sowohl Spinat als auch Knoblauch “hält sich hartnäckig”. Die Kombination ist einfach der Nährstoffhimmel für ca. 3 Wochen im Jahr.
It looks like a strategy game but actually isn’t. The strategy part just isn’t developed enough. It’s a story and RPG style game with a strong focus on economy management. The game discourages strategy by telling you how strong an army is (as a number) and giving you no tactical option. Meaning higher numbers will always win.
The (new) DLCs are mostly very bad and short so the game as a whole is in a strange state where you can play a good game with missing features without DLC or you play a bad game with lots of features that is very expensive with all the DLC.
I kinda hope that the game dies soon because the frequent game breaking updates and optional (and disadvantages) DLC makes modding annoying even though there are extremely fun mods, even better than the DLC.
The normal lead we know but still special. Is the last stable element in the PSE and there is the theory that it’s actually radioactive (unstable) but the decay is so slow that we probably never see a single atom of it decaying.
I always wondered what would happen if you cite an original source of something we consider common sense now. What would nature say if you use conservation of momentum and cite Isaac Newton and the Principia Mathematica.
What if you quote something in latin. For most of science history this was completely normal.
Die Leuchtfeuer von Minas Tirith. Die Leuchtfeuer brennen. Gondor bittet um Hilfe.
Schau dir auch Mal “das Recht auf Faulheit” von Paul Lafarge an. Insbesondere der Teil über den “Kapitalismus der sich selbst abschafft” ist eine gruselig präzise Beschreibung der Welt insbesondere der USA.
Zusammengefasst steht da dass Kapitalismus irgendwann so erfolgreich ist, dass es zu viele Reiche auf zu wenig Arme gibt und dann einfach die Konsumenten fehlen. Dadurch werden die Reichen zu einer würdelosen Dekadenz gezwungen, einfach um den Konsum zu produzieren den der Kapitalismus braucht.
One Word you mentioned showed nicely what you missed here: Plain
Originally it was called an aeroplane. This could be translated with “flat thing in the air”. Which is exactly as ridiculous as your other examples in German. The difference is that Germans don’t mind complicated long words where English does so they just drop the part they don’t like.
Ich brauche kein Immunsystem. Ich bin im Grunde eine einzige große Riesenfresszelle.
I never understood BRICS. Sure, they are the second line of industrial powers (China?) but especially India Russia and China hate each other to the bone. They are partners only on paper. If someone can explain it to me please go on .