Not surprising. Any platform with a significant number of users ultimately becomes a potential vector to steer public discourse at large scale. And I do think it's clear that Epstein was more than just a broker for a child abuse island; he was a middleman through which rich and influential people could connect and coordinate.
And it really shouldn't be underestimated just how influential 4chan was. In the latter half of the 2000s, it slowly but surely became the dominant force in creating internet meme culture, taking that crown from Something Awful, and largely influencing how people talked in those days. There was a reason the "f slur" was so common, and that was long before /pol/ even came into existence.
By 2010/2011, Ragefaces were the main "generic" meme format that people used on sites like 9gag, and they originated from 4chan. These would then be switched out for the Wojak/Pepe format that would become mainstream around 2013/2014, Pepe itself being largely perpetuated by /pol/. The frog has largely fallen out of favor for being associated with nazis, but the Wojak format persists, even within leftist communities, over 12 years later. A ton of internet expressions and mannerism originate from 4chan, so it's not surprising that it would become a target for rich people to influence public discourse.
This is the forest that people missed for the trees when Musk took over Twitter. For all the chants of how Musk was wasting a lot of money, how investors would leave, how the site might become unstable because of important people being fired, and how it would all turn into a disaster and collapse -- people seemed to barely consider the potential long-term gain for Musk in terms of narrative control by taking over such a huge social media site. Unsurprisingly, Musk then decided to get directly involved with the Trump administration, taking direct advantage of the media platform he now controlled. And the site persists, now considered a lawless trash dump with selective and sparse moderation, where far-right ideology can thrive, very much like 4chan.
And in the coming weeks and months, we will see such a takeover unfold with TikTok as well. There can be no major platform of public discourse online that rich and influential people will not attempt to take control of. It simply cannot be allowed to exist.
The cyanide comic is shit, but that isn't the point. What makes the "I love science" crowd annoying is that they aren't trying to engage with the topic at all. You can't gatekeep when nobody is attempting to pass the gate.
It's like people who claim they love books, when all they do is stack them in their shelves to appear intelligent.
I loved that part in the last book where Ron, Harry and Hermione went out into the world to collect votes from apathetic sorcerers to finally defeat Voldemort for good.
Well they were taught a harsh lesson that their epic sanctions packages don't actually work. It would be foolish to try it again on an even more powerful enemy.
What this "Trade Bazooka" involves, gathered from an article on Politico and the Wikipedia article:
Brussels can impose or increase customs duties, restrict exports or imports through quotas or licenses, and impose restrictions on the trade in services.
It also can target the third country’s access to public procurement and foreign direct investment in the EU. Moreover, it can restrict intellectual property rights and access to the bloc’s financial markets.
If those efforts fail, the EU may adopt "response measures" such as tariffs, restrictions on trade in goods and services, limits on access to public programmes and financial markets, or measures affecting intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment.
Methinks this would be about as effective as those 20 Russia sanctions packages the EU has deployed, and in fact, would be playing right into Trump's hands by further increasing the economic pressure on the EU.
If the EU deployed this "Bazooka", they would only manage to incinerate themselves in the backblast while only marginally damaging the US.
Not quite 1:1 with fandom which operates for-profit but I can say almost any wiki on fandom is largely edited by anywhere from 0-4 people, and in many cases it is 0 because there is significantly less motivation to contribute to something that isn't a wholly community project and is instead benefitting some corporation.
Oh yeah, I'm aware, I was involved with some Fandom wikis too in the past, even back when it was still called "Wikia".
Unfortunately, for many communities there isn't a good alternative, since not many people have the time and resources to host one themselves.