Wow. Shocker. Capitalism isn’t so easily reformable toward sustainability. I don’t understand why more democrats, like the ones who have been up until now relying on the sentiment of large financial institutions and corporations to finish the job of addressing climate change, don’t get their head in the game and realize how eco-unfriendly so much of capitalism is, and, depending on one’s definition of capitalism, how eco-unfriendly all of capitalism may be. I think some of them have developed a greater love for their white picket fence-esque life as marketed to them in real time than for understanding the impact of scientific information about climate change on the life of the planet including their own per an authentic scientific understanding - because the latter starts to look more socialist by almost every definition of socialism.

A fungus infecting the ecosystem and crops in the san joaquin valley that makes people get this fever thing, makes everyone sniffly kind of and some other stuff.

Yeah it sure is cheap living in the bread basket of the world, the san joaquin valley. My rent is 334. I even have housing assistance. Ag ag ag is all I hear here, and everyone has no idea how unsustainable industrialized agriculture is. Plus the droughts, the toxicity, the general poverty, and also valley fever.

Cascadian Laboratories Incorporated “CascaLab” on Facebook pages. Our website is down and our donation mechanism doesn’t work right now. We’re very small and new, since 2022 we were founded. We do almost nothing but feyerabend-inspired research remote from one another. It’s kind of coddiwompling and we try to research ways of making sure we’re not doing armchair research, that we’re actually testing real world things. One thing I test is home economics solutions. We’re actually wondering about creating a federated network of nonprofit think tanks of similar size just meeting the minimum requirements for a 501 ( c ) 3 each of them rather than actually scaling. I picked some of my closest friends, those among them who were most excited about doing it. I used legalzoom to create it.

Something I’ve found is actually working on oneself physically, practicing good physiological health so that one can biomechanically maintain good hand eye coordination, can avoid dropping or bumping equipment or devices for long periods of time (like many many everyday people are well known to constantly do), maintaining good awareness of your environment, and being able to connect with your equipment, devices, and hardware pragmatically the way a blue collar worker might personally connect with their machinery. This way, you can really stretch the lifespan of your hardware. Also, remember that brokenness is relative and along a gradient, not a binary question - if you can get functionality out of a device or hardware, especially according to your prioritization of need, then fundamentally it works; you just have to ‘jimmy it a little bit’ maybe, to use a blue-collar-ism.

I have a laptop from the early 2000s I maintain, an Xbox one I use for most functions still from 2018 or earlier, two android smartphones both for different purposes over 3 years old each without ever having used phone covers. And I went for a physical at the clinic and they said my stats on my health were above the 90th percentile of health for my age. I’m a bioregionalist so I’m always trying to be systemically “of” my surroundings, region, and community as a vital living breathing human being, and I use ASMR videos on YouTube to liven up my sensory capacities to connect therein to my surroundings and maintain a solid environmental awareness; helps in not dropping or bumping things hardly ever, or spilling liquids on anything.

Those are my first principles.

There are so many authors to let into my soul and digest. I operate a small 501 ( c ) 3 think tank so I’ve been in the process of letting Paul Feyerabend into my soul. It’s a real emotional move to sit down and start absorbing a new author, to be honest. I was going to start on Marcuse next.

Wonderful. For what it’s worth I’m here and I support this area of thought and work very very much. It seems to be another battlefield in the science wars or adjacent - techies getting mad because people are trying to comment socially (or in this case ecosocially) on what they, the diehard techies, regard as objective reality in their domain of study. Well it doesn’t mean we can’t endeavor to think in an interdisciplinary way here. It’s weird how militant even many of these open source ‘anarchist’ zealots get about some people trying to see what they can do about addressing the issue of a massive machine of planetary destruction. I mean it seems right up their alley otherwise.