Before LLMs people were often saying this about people smarter than the rest of the group. “Yeah he was too smart and overengineered solutions that no one could understand after he left,”.
Wut. At software shops the prevailing atmosphere is that you should use it and broadcast it as much as possible. This person's experience is not normal
"Some random people were wrong about something in the past so nobody is allowed to speculate that any technology isn't as revolutionary as it's hyped to be ever again" is not a useful or compelling argument.
I think I like the current one better from a usability perspective because it opens where I can access the whole thing with my thumb without having to stretch. Looks like that might not be the case here but we'll see I suppose
Assuming that's the menu that is accessed from the tab bar, my first thought is that it doesn't have everything the current one has. Where are "find in page" and "desktop site"?
I think a lot of people are going to struggle getting their head around the idea of voice being a reliable, primary input method when using a PC, but with agentic AI and the ability for the OS to understand user intent and natural language, it's going to feel a lot more natural than you might think.
You're damn right we're going to struggle. I won't believe it is reliable enough to be anything but infuriating until I see it.
Mainstream media. For instance when Dario Amodei says AI is going to replace x% of jobs by 2027 the media prints it and doesn't ask why he thinks that or ask where the numbers come from. It's wild speculation and it does not get treated as such.
They also mindlessly broadcast whatever lies the CEOs of the big tech company's are telling. Do you complain about that pattern too? No? You just don't like anything negative about AI? Interesting.
A transformer model isn't always an llm, nor does a type of algorithm/data model/whatever being useful for one purpose mean it is equally useful for all other purposes.
This part.