I keep picking instances that don’t last. I’m formerly known as:
@EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
@EpeeGnome@lemmy.fmhy.net
@EpeeGnome@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
@EpeeGnome@lemmy.fmhy.ml

  • 3 Posts
  • 258 Comments
Joined 1 年前
cake
Cake day: 2025年6月5日

help-circle





  • Essentially yes. I don’t know a lot of details about how trials work either, but it’s common in murder trials (and maybe some other types?) for the judge to allow “impact statements” from people affected by the crime. They can kinda say whatever they want, and sometimes they do include what they think the deceased would have wanted to say if they could.

    I recall hearing about this case when it happened from a legal commenter I sometimes watch. They ginned up this video by having a text to speech read the statement they wrote for their allowed impact statement. The defense objected of course, but the judge thought it was a wonderful idea and enthusiastically allowed it.

    I saw a bit of the “AI” video, and I can’t imagine why they thought showing that was a good idea. It was so cringey it would have kept me from taking any of it seriously if I was considering that case. The sister says she made it to help humanize her brother, but to me it had the opposite effect.



  • If you go with the stand your ground solution, it doesn’t matter what the driver thinks. Because you have all the evidence needed that he came at you with malicious intent, and also the driver is dead at the end and cannot contradict you. If a trolley comes at you like that, you have a legal right to stand your ground and defend yourself with lethal force. At that point no other moral or philosophical factors matter once you decide to stand your ground. (Legality may vary by jurisdiction.)





  • Bees have a separate stomach just for storing nectar that doesn’t have any digestive juices, so it’s not vomit vomit, but they do swallow the nectar down as they drink it from flowers and then regurgitate it back up into a cell in the wax comb back at the hive. They then evaporate most of the water out of it with air from their wings. When it’s full of honey, they cap the cell off with more wax.

    At some point the beekeeper takes a portion of the honeycomb out of the hive, and brushes any bees still on it off into the hive. The caps are cut off to let the honey out, and then typically it is centrifuged to get the honey out quickly. There’s a lot more details of course, but that’s the jist of it.



  • For sure, I agree on all of that. I just meant it would be really neat to find out that a nationally known political figure actually was at the center of such a group. Admittedly it would be a terrible idea political strategy-wise and I don’t recommend it, but I would enjoy it. Some “christian” politicians may openly claim and join in with their “prayer warriors” or whatever so that’s normal, but for obvious reasons none of them ever publicly ally with the witches. Would be a nice change of pace if one did, aside from the whole tanking their career part.






  • The important thing to keep in mind is that we are not currently at risk of anyone inventing a super intelligence. The word guessing engines are getting amazingly good at guessing words, but the huge jump from that to actual intelligence, super or otherwise, remains out of reach with currently known technology.

    I agree that if we did manage to invent that, the biggest threat would be the humans doing short-sighted, greedy and generally stupid shit with it. No coincidence that that’s also the biggest threat from current LLMs.

    Edit: “Super-hammers could break containment and kill us all if we don’t invest more in controlling them!” shouts man wildly swinging around a hammer in a crowded room. “The government needs to regulate this technology so that only people like me, who use it responsibly, can have access to it,” he added. He tried to say more, but was out of breath after some particularly enthusiastic hammer swings.