Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)E
Posts
0
Comments
247
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • The actual type of play on words is called paraprosdokian. Where the in this case punchline is surprising in a way that makes you reinterpret the setup.

    In this case "I wanna be supportive but," is kind of priming the reader to expect they're gonna say some transphobic shit then you read "fucking Mildred?" and those expectations are subverted by the actual point being essentially "Why you taking names from 2000's obituaries?"

    To my knowledge there's not like a widespread name for this as like a comedic genre because it's just one of the basic ways you can structure a joke. I've seen some comics call it a swerve or an anti-climax but nothing widespread.

  • Knowing him he'll probably allow them to get on that "Gold Card" track without the money as a show of "combating the horrible racial injustice" in South Africa.

    Every accusation is a confession after all. So it would be very on brand for them to fast track granting these people status that allows them to vote so now they'll be the ones with the "millions of illegals voting" for them.

  • I think I get what it's saying? It's saying that while your phone isn't directly listening to your conversations in any meaningful way they collect crazy amounts of other data on basically everyone and can piece it together in such a way that they can make some scary accurate guesses as to the kind of ads to serve you based on what their systems have gathered your interests are and where/with whom you spend your time.

    I'm not entirely sure. They didn't really seem to present much more than speculation on it.

  • TrumPutin

    Jump
  • It's like the Old Man Yaoi version of Thanos trying to court Death by killing half of all life in the universe.

  • I remembered myself hearing about some interview where she said something similar. Went looking for it and found a Vanity Fair interview from 2006 where she says:

    I slept with some nerd. I hope it was George. I took too many drugs to remember.

    When asked about how she got cast in Star Wars back in the day. So not enough to say she got directly extorted sex for the role, or just happened to be sleeping around and whoever she slept with went "Damn, she'd be great in this movie."

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Then they should be educated out of those ignorant views, not have their rights restricted. What are you gonna do when some wannabe fascist decides that "basic voting condition" means believing that trans people don't exist, that climate change is a hoax, and that the ultra-wealthy shouldn't pay any taxes actually?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • The right to vote shouldn't be restricted in any way. If you have legal restrictions then all it takes is bad actors expanding those categories and sorry, you just failed the critical thinking test because you think that climate change is real and life doesn't begin at conception. Better get ready for your shift at Amazon, serf.

    Media literacy and such should just be part of the education everyone gets.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Don't ya just hate it when people make their harmful kink both their entire personality, and a problem for your fundamental rights? It feels weird to say it. But that's basically what this performative Christian schtick is for people like this. They get off in it so now it's all of our problem.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • It was only supposed to be a little instability Donald! Give us a little dip that we could use to buy up another chunk of the pie. NOT BLOW UP THE ENTIRE FOUNDATION OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE DONALD!

    • The Cato Institute, probably?
  • I think so. I looked up the definition quickly to be sure, and:

    shamelessly immoral or debauched. wildly extravagant or wasteful.

    I know they wouldn't think so obviously. But a lot of that seems to fit pretty well I think the whole goal of "force whatever woman I can to be my own personal Bang Maid subject to all my whims," kinda qualifies.

  • Anyone who listened to Trump and Vance explain them basically. For months they've been straight up lying to their voters that if they put a tariff on China, then China would have to pay to ship their products to the US. How they're going to bring in all this money from China and the rest of the countries that had been supposedly "screwing us" in trade.

  • Oh yes, tie their ability to stay in the country to them staying in a marriage to someone who actively despises their existence...

    Oh wait, that's the "Greatness" a lot of these chuds want to bring back. The days before the country was "ruined" by "No-Fault Divorce" when women couldn't have their own bank accounts and were at the mercy of their husbands/fathers... Right.

  • Gods I am not awake yet. I was legit confused why he was getting led away if the Lady taught Elementary school. Had to read that like 4 times before it finally clicked that the joke was she's IN Elementary.

  • Literally from your link they quote him saying.

    ...but it does not have the right to use US dollars to kill thousands of innocent men, women, and children in Gaza.

    But Oh No he didn't say the Magic Word to the press 2 months in when we still have 0 idea what internal discussions were happening. Can't give the guy with probably the longest track record of being on the right side of pretty much every issue any benefit of the doubt. Especially not when he has before been very vocal about Palestinian rights. Couldn't possibly be any good reason he didn't use the Magic Purity Word.

  • Color me surprised. A video with a hostile interviewer trying to bait him into making statements that paint pro-Palestinian sentiment as pro-Hamas and him predictably navigating the "do you condemn Hamas?" traps.

    Of course that outweighs him using the power he has to try to block 20 billion dollars worth of weapons. Heaven forbid he try to be an effective advocate and not demonstrate perfect ideological purity in every interview and talk no matter how it might impede him actually trying to fucking do something about it.

  • More entirely missing the point. He was literally one of the only voices trying to block weapons to Israel. But no, he didn't stop them entirely on his own or call Biden "Genocide Joe" so that must mean he supports the genocide.

    It's really starting to sound like there's literally nothing he could have done that would have been good enough for you.

  • My Sibling in Satan, how do you think making these demands work? This is an asymmetrical fight. Most of the time you won't get a direct answer because the politicians are playing a different game. By and large they won't commit to anything before the election that might alienate large sections of voters one way or the other.

    Electoral politics is about choosing your battlefield for the action to come. In a presidential election it is a mathematical fact that there are only two viable options. Yes, they're both captured to varying degrees by capital. But you can get a sense of who is more likely to accept the things you want.

    There was 0 chance of the Republicans stopping what's happening in Gaza for example. Clearly the chance was at least close to 0 with the Democrats but they were more vulnerable on that front and almost certainly they at least wouldn't be trying to send pro-Palestinian activists to a gulag in El Salvador. So given this context which is the more advantageous battlefield you try to advocate on? There is a correct answer here and it's the Democrats.

    Is it fair? Absolutely not. Are you running the risk of getting them elected and still not doing what you want? Yep. But a risk they won't listen is objectively better than a guarantee the Republicans won't listen. This is why electoral politics cannot be the only arena where we're fighting, but it's an arena we still have to fight on because it determines the battlefield other action takes place on.

  • A bunch of comments going for the "why would you buy toilet paper that already has shit on it" route, but I can't believe nobody went for calling this a shit(tickets) post.

  • You mean things like Single-Payer Healthcare, Housing as a Human Right, increasing the minimum wage, or any of the myriad of other policy positions that he talks about every time he talks basically anywhere? That thing he already does?