Skip Navigation

∞🏳️‍⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]

@ Edie @lemmy.ml

Posts
0
Comments
490
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Lemmy.world has defederated lemmygrad, so Irish_link can't see your comment.

  • Despite saying Davel banned you from "everywhere he could", you haven't been permanently banned from .ml, despite the fact that clearly you should have been

  • He’s a mod so he banned me from everywhere he could

    Goes to check modlog

    History of misgendering/trolling

    It's a ban on midwest.social, not even .ml

    Misgenders unapologetically

    blahaj

  • Deleted

    Jerkoff

    Jump
  • If you aren't one of these, then what are you? I guess there still is reactionary, off to the right of the image.

  • Deleted

    Jerkoff

    Jump
  • Do you really need to read volumes of theory to grasp what is fundamentally a rather straightforward concept?

    Yes! The three volumes on shitting are essential reads. (/s)

  • Deleted

    Jerkoff

    Jump
  • You are already living in a class war. You are below the poverty line because of it.

  • Two spaces at the end of a lineMakes a new line

  • So I checked it out... never directly states where the data is from ("PRC state media and data", "party documents and data reportedly obtained from local public security bureaus in Xinjiang", it continues to be this vague never specific throughout), most of the dates end in 2021/2022 (for the latter e.g. "the last date for which authorities have issued such reports", so that doesn't show it hasn't ended in 2021)

    The closest thing you have in there is

    the continued elevated number of indictments in 2022 suggests that the campaign continues

    Are there other, better, sources?

  • Blahaj.zone ain't sending their best.

  • Do you have stuff on this? Not sources, I'm not asking you to prove you are correct, I was wondering since you said this that you may have something that I can take a look at.

  • “The whole working gang is interested in production. The program for next month is discussed with all of us. The foreman calls a meeting and tells us that the administration wants us to put out 3,000 milling tools next month. How shall we do it? We discuss in detail; each of us says what he can do. It all adds up to 4,000. So the foreman goes to the administration and raises the plan to 4,000. [...]

    https://comlib.encryptionin.space/epubs/this-soviet-world/

  • And most of it a wasteland, uninhabitable for humans... well for now

  • Liberals do not want to critique Marxism, they wish to endlessly dismiss it

  • Minor point: GDR and DDR are the same, just in English and German.

  • "neutral" as if.

    Edit: also oh no! Not the Stalinist... prohibition on using handcuffs?

    But the idea was there in the minds of those who were to define the penal policy and the Code of 1922, and set down the principle that punishment was not for the purpose of revenge and might not have for its purpose the infliction of physical pain. With this beginning there was a steady progress toward the removing of those indignities that tend to degrade a man, until the Correctional Labor Code of 1933 completed the process. In the meantime various amendments have prohibited torture, the use of handcuffs, solitary confinement, deprivation of food, or any other measure that would have the effect of degradation or do physical harm to the person.