Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)D
Posts
0
Comments
319
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • They factually are. ML is AI. I think you mean AGI maybe?

  • Uh dismissing that concern seems like valid point? Do people have to comprehensively discredit the whole list to reply?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Not as much as when Trump does it anyway

  • Same thing happened with Epstein. Everyone was calling that shot before they took it.

  • Deleted

    Infighting

    Jump
  • I’m saying it because I’ve seen them make the same argument, as I have done myself, in different ways.

  • Deleted

    Infighting

    Jump
  • I’m saying it because I’ve seen them make the same argument, as I have done myself, in different ways.

    Then maybe you didn't read the conversation

  • Deleted

    Infighting

    Jump
  • My point is that being “anti-authoritarian” is meaningless unless

    That seems to be your new point and again I don't care to argue what a "true about authoritarian" is. If you think me wanting the ss to have been executed after the Holocaust disqualifies me as anti authoritarian you're welcome to think that, I don't respect your opinion in that case. That was the conversation where you entered.

  • Deleted

    Infighting

    Jump
  • Their argument is that I'm not anti authoritarian. Afaict you're not making that argument. I'm not interested in fighting about what is or isn't a true Scotsman. This devolves quickly into if you believe in the government having any power, that's an endorsement of authoritarianism and now no one can be anti authoritarian if they believe in any kind of enforceable law.

  • Deleted

    Infighting

    Jump
  • No I'm pretty sure they pulled something from another post to try to misrepresent it because they're a bitter terminally online loser. That is a very generous interpretation though

  • Deleted

    Infighting

    Jump
  • Protecting Jewish and other minorities rights to live and safety is not an authoritarian act. It is in fact protecting the most vulnerable's liberty. Anti authorization is not lawless. You are a very weird little person and I have no interest in trying to convince you Nazis are bad. I hope you can figure that one out on your own

  • Deleted

    Infighting

    Jump
  • Me? Is this because I said the SS should have been executed?

  • Deleted

    Infighting

    Jump
  • I'm anti authoritarian and anti right. Tankies are leftists that I have no interest in getting along with. They are just as excited to be holding the gun in this comic

  • get sum

    Jump
  • get sum

    Jump
  • Is there something in the graph that suggests it's from the UK?

  • get sum

    Jump
  • I assume they don't want to open a can of worms regarding childhood abuse. Doesn't seem needless

  • do you just not understand the concept of degrees of effect?

    I swear Lemmy has some of the dumbest people on the internet. Do you have the faintest idea what the point of this entire post and thread is? Have you heard of harm reduction? I just can't engage with people this dumb anymore. Good luck figuring it out

  • I was providing an example of how little ‘winning’ the popular vote matters at all.

    No you weren't. Again, do you just not understand the concept of degrees of effect? That's the entire point that you're ignoring.

    And I'm very concerned about you. It is not feigned

  • I watched Bush get elected while losing the popular vote and he invaded two countries

    Did I say Dems are good and bad things wouldn't happen under them? Do you just not understand the concept of degrees of effect? What a disingenuous thing to bring up

    If you’re trying to sway me with this, just stop you fucked up, but it’s ok.

    What even are you trying to say? You're indecipherable from satire

  • Pretend you're a Republican politician that wants to enact project 2025 which is unpopular with your constituents. Does the guy leading the charge winning the popular vote give you more or less plausible deniability when it comes to your next campaign and you're trying to distance yourself from it? How can't you see "he won the popular vote" being a great excuse for them on every level to support him? And the opposition has to excuse not supporting the "popular" platform. If you're trying to rationalize not voting as it not mattering just stop, you fucked up but it's ok, don't let the cognitive dissonance help them