Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)D
Posts
0
Comments
36
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • thanks dude, I appreciate it!

  • wow... that's incredible! thanks!

  • Had an NVME fritz out on me on a passively cooled NUC because of thermals, I suspect. That sucked.

  • I'm really interested in this! How do you passively cool something like that? It's to get quite under load, no?

  • aren't pretty much all Li(Fe)Po cells made cheaply in China?

  • Yeah, I do agree it's a fair bit of Apple-bashing. I've also learned by reading through other replies in this thread that apparently Apple's standby mode is very reliable and consumes <1W. It's apparently also very easy to wake back up.

    I can say none of that about my Windows and Linux machines 😅 so that may be where my confusion came from

  • And then how do you turn it back on?

  • ist das deren ernst? Bei aller Liebe für zivilen Ungehorsam und Einsatz für die Natur, aber diese Forderungshaltung in Verbindung mit den Stilblüten aus'm Blog ("die Cops haben uns gestern nach noch viel Erfolg gewünscht und dann gelacht") wirkt das irgendwie sehr unbeholfen

  • I'm with you in general - but the original timeline sounds much so much more quacky than what OP posted that in this instance I'm fine with it

  • noooooooi

  • I'm not saying none of this is true, but at the very least most of this is misleading. We're figuring out how to recycle old solar panels on an industrial scale: https://youtu.be/FCtEWveySsA

    But progress is a bit slower than expected, mostly also because panels are a lot longer-lived than previously assumed (this is a good thing).

    Yes, panels use rare minerals, but so does basically everything we consume and use nowadays. There's two answers to that.

    A) does it still make sense climate-wise to use these resources in solar panels? This is what Life Cycle Analyses are for. In general, throughout their life cycle, PV modules help prevent more CO2 emissions than their manufacturing process releases, i.e. they are a net gain (https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/252). This is similar to EV vehicles, which break even around 60k km driven depending on your electricity generation (if memory serves https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2023/733112/IPOL_STU(2023)733112_EN.pdf)

    b) is there a way to manufacture PV panels less resource-intensive and maybe even without relying on (Chinese) rare earth minerals as much? Yes there is. https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ise/de/documents/publications/studies/ISE-Sustainable-PV-Manufacturing-in-Europe.pdf and see also sources above for next-gen differences.

    That being said, for now it's still economically more attractive (usually) to implement Chinese panels because they're flooding the market. Still, it's a net gain as outlined.

  • yo, do you blog? I would read your blog/diary/novel. You have a very calm(ing), distanced and at the same time immediate sense to your writing. It's good readin'!

  • Also bought Nova Launcher Prime, but they were apparently acquired in the last year so now Nova is spyware? Anyway, I switched over to Kvaesitso and couldn't be happier.

  • well, but it is news that Alex Jones is at it again.

  • Reminder: none of the currently available methods of cloud seeding are proven to work.

    https://www.wired.com/story/new-gods-weather-rain-cloud-seeding-emirates/

    Yes, it all works in theory and in the lab, but in practice we have no idea if cloud seeding "makes it rain" or if it would have rained anyway (to make a long story very short).

    So take anything anyone says about "them making it rain" with, like, two grains of salt.

  • I really can't tell if you're serious or not.