Dr. Bob

Paisley Lightfoot

I have an older comment that goes through Tesla’s litany of woes and the stock goes up with every piece of bad news. It is being supported by something other than reality.

I’m pretty sure it’s something.

Im an Xer but my parents were born in the 1920s. My parents were the same ages as my friends grandparents. I grew up listening to swing music at home. Lol.

Good luck with that.

She’s postwar. Boomer by definition. Silent generation is for children raised during the war.

Eta: I looked up the dates and I can see a lot of sources that give the 1946 date so consensus is on your side. I’m old, but the boundary used to be those who were raised during the war vs those who wouldn’t have any memory of it. There is the same argument on the other side as well where late boomers claim to be “Generation Jones” between boomers and X.

Dude those are not different generations. They are both early boomers.

I know your paper route may not have crises Jordan, but some businesses do.

I agree with you. My guess is a 3" heel to put her at around 5’7". I think he’s about 5’10" based on all the pictures of him with Bill Barr. I think he has two different lift heights depending on who he’s meeting with. I honestly don’t care about all of this that much, but I find it hilarious.

With all the bots on the site why complain about these ones?

Edit: auto$#&"$correct

I’m a scholar. It means not pulling stuff from your ass and citing your sources.

Technology can therefore be defined both as an ensemble of deliberately created processes and objects that together accomplish some function as well as the associated knowledge and skills used in the conception, design, implementation, and operation of such technological artifacts.

O. L. de Weck, Technology Roadmapping and Development, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88346-1_1

Start with your silly claim that “advertising”, as you define it, occurred 30,000 years ago. Any non-suppositional evidence please.

What are you even on about? Persuasion is not advertising. And in the absence of a material culture for advertising, there is literally no basis for the 30,000 year claim. This is pure nonsense and the worst kind of bullshit.

Your late cat clearly had an “outie”.

There’s plenty of blame to go around, but this is a stone cold stupid take.

Nobody else seems to remember the Hillary is 44 movement. It was an early version of foreign mischief and tried to do to the left what the Tea Party did to the right.

When I said she was John the Baptist I was actually thinking of her first run at president when she and John McCain were doing vodka shots in Moscow laughing about how one of them was going to be president.

She could have been a herald for a rejuvenation of the Democrats with a younger face. Instead she fought it all the way down.

Well does it!!??!? DON’T LEAVE US HANGING!!1!!1!

She was. She was John the Baptist but wanted to be Jesus. Opinion on her was fully established so even if she was 45% positive you could never move the dial on the 6% you needed to push her over the top.

She would have been an outstanding attack dog for a fresh candidate if she could have put her ego aside and accept that it wouldn’t be her.

Advertising is not a technology and there is no evidence that advertising occured 30,000 years ago. That time period predates capitalism, products and competition among manufacturers, and written language.