I mean it says right there that they're only targeting "Democrat-run" states, and they don't seem to have any evidence of the alleged crimes, or they'd be talking about how other states are impacted too.
To read this and not see how biased and one-sided it is? You'd have to be pretty deep down the rabbit hole, cause it's not like they're trying hard to hide it.
According to the article, this was his literal next sentence:
And not only that, it took the very widespread evolution of the 100 billion people that have ever lived and learned not to get eaten by predators and learned how to figure out science and whatever, to produce you.
Big Obesity brands. People are taking a medication to try and overcome food branding, and their response is to double down and try and market their way out of this? Baffling.
I remember watching early Lost promo videos where a very smug JJ Abrams swore blind there was a fully logical explanation for everything happening. And then a polar bear showed up. And I realised that whatever definition of "fully logical explanation" he was using probably didn't align with my own definitions of those words lol. That show was pure hype with talented actors.
When previous presidents named their healthcare supports after themselves, like Obamacare, it was portrayed as an alternate name to the official title, and clearly tried to keep things bipartisan.
TrumpRX sounds like he's personally making money off this new platform.
The article says the punishments are triggered sometimes even sfter they stop in front of the light because of how fast they can accelerate when leaving. And punishments aren't handled evenly across the province. Officers in Windsor are docked 6 hrs pay for a first offence and 12 more for a second.
It sure seems like there should be room for discussion.
Then we're all in agreement, right?