So, while I agree on that part, the maintainer of snorblite is one step from getting shut down by the feds due to radical actions and an alleged affiliation to a known csa distribution network. As soon as he’s brought in for questioning, all data tied to his machines will be deleted and we’ll have to rely on forks of the library from previous versions with outdated dependencies.

I like how you think they’d have to be a US company to donate

Those same ones who cry 2nd amendment are the ones who got taken.

Unfortunately, the ones who told these idiots that they were idiots are also the same people who want to “take away their guns” and aren’t generally the type to use the 2nd amendment as it was intended. :/

It’s because:

start of thing == dopamine

finish of thing != dopamine

We yearn for the brain juice and hop from hit to hit

Neurotypical people do not have this issue, I’m told

Who could have ever foreseen this happening /s

It would be if they didn’t consistently spin the failures onto their defacto opponents and their base willfully taking their word at face value despite actual evidence to the contrary.

Honest question, what is the GOP going to do when his 4 years is over assuming that he doesn’t pull a Putin and just stay in power until usurped or killed. They’ve gone so far into him as the leader that any challenger is disowned from the party so what happens if they follow the law and he no longer is able to run?

What I’d like to become the standard is:

If the question makes it super obvious the asker has zero clue what they’re asking or trying to do, lightly correct and steer them to beginner friendly resources.

If the question is competent but focusing the wrong direction or will lead to a bad habit, essentially, they know just enough to be dangerous but they’re about to be dangerous, more pointed and technical correction and steering them to either articles or better search terms to use.

If it’s a pointed question with the information to show they’ve done the normal information gathering and either need opinions that are beyond the theory or book standard information or they don’t answer the question, answer the question. Ideally also giving sources to back up your answers.

Bonus points if you can do the above without coming across as a dick. Unless they ask to ask. You can be a dick to those people.

That doesn’t exactly equate to constantly writing well. I’ve met many engineers and scientists (computer or otherwise) who couldn’t give 2 shits about proper English unless it was specifically for a grade, sending to clients, or publication.

Educated doesn’t mean that you stop writing informally. It just means you’re able to write formally.

If the transcript I’ve seen floating around is accurate, the phrase “this was fairly trivial” absolutely was about how difficult it was to pull off. The lines above and below it talk about super basic social engineering that anyone could do and the hard part of the tool engineering has already been done.

I didn’t realize we were playing blackout bingo. Either way, bingo

I would find it hilarious if it sparks class solidarity, personally

It’s called the husband stitch and it is exactly as horrid as it seems if not moreso. Hopefully a dying trend.

His work is geared towards introduction to concepts not full lectures.

https://youtu.be/6eC6ITjVf28?si=tNE3IyluWZMy_2Vt

I mean, when you start categorizing things by phylogenetics instead of phenetics, you realize that certain body plans happen a lot more than expected.

Man, you’re not going to like the technicalities of what is and isn’t a penguin…

They’re being called radical Marxists, communists, etc

fuck Athena

Not a wise decision but I’m willing

It’s a vicious cycle because people who are generally good singers will assume they’re terrible since they’re not as pitch perfect. Then, they’ll either never sing or modify their sound to perfection to compete